Our plain-English summary of Spontaneous polymerisation on amphibole asbestos: relevance to asbestos removal, by I. Fenoglio, M. Tomatis, B. Fubini (Chemical Communications, 2001).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: I. Fenoglio, M. Tomatis, B. Fubini
- Journal: Chemical Communications
- Published: 2001:2182-3
- Cited by: 5 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Taking advantage of the spontaneous polymerisation of eugenol to lignin-like species catalysed by the surface of crocidolite fibres, a procedure is proposed, possibly useful in asbestos removal and disposal, where the polymer avoids the release of airborne fibres and also scavenges ROS (reactive oxygen species).
In plain English
This short laboratory chemistry report from the University of Turin, Italy, tested a chemical treatment on crocidolite, a type of amphibole asbestos. The authors added hydrogen peroxide to crocidolite fibres suspended in a water solution of eugenol, a substance that can form a lignin-like polymer (a solid resembling a natural component of wood). After the reaction, the fibres appeared to be completely included in the polymer. In electron microscope images, the product was a smooth solid lump with no free fibres at its surface; single fibres trapped inside were visible only at very high magnification. No changes in the polymer were detected several months later. In two cell-free tests, with hydrogen peroxide or sodium formate, untreated crocidolite released reactive chemicals called free radicals, but no radical release was observed from treated crocidolite. Some activity returned only after heavy grinding exposed fresh fibre surfaces. The authors concluded that, once set up for practical application, the reaction might be proposed as a step in asbestos removal, to avoid airborne fibres and turn the material into a solid for disposal. The work involved no people, animals or real removal sites.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: laboratory chemistry experiment, including cell-free tests of free radical release before and after treatment
- Who was studied: laboratory samples of crocidolite (fibrous riebeckite) asbestos fibres, studied at the University of Turin, Italy (published 2001); amounts not stated
- Exposure: crocidolite fibres treated with eugenol and hydrogen peroxide so that a lignin-like polymer formed on the fibres
- Main results:
- After treatment, the crocidolite fibres appeared to be completely included in a polymer, and the product was a solid lump
- Microscope images showed no free fibres at the surface of the treated product; fibres trapped inside were detectable only at higher magnification
- The polymer showed no detectable changes several months later
- In the tests with hydrogen peroxide and with sodium formate, no free radical release was observed from treated crocidolite, unlike untreated crocidolite
- Radical-releasing activity of treated crocidolite was partially restored only after heavy grinding
- The authors attributed the loss of activity partly to the reduced exposed surface and partly to the polymer mopping up free radicals
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the reaction, once set up for practical application, may be proposed as an intermediate step in asbestos removal, avoiding airborne fibres and turning fibrous material into a solid for disposal
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Amphibole Asbestos, Crocidolite, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS).
Related studies
- Separation and characterization of respirable amphibole fibers from Libby, Montana — J.S. Webber, D.J. Blake, et al. (2008)
- Molecular engineering of a fluorescent bioprobe for sensitive and selective detection of amphibole asbestos — T. Ishida, M. Alexandrov, et al. (2013)
- Biodegradable mesoporous calcium-magnesium silicate-polybutylene succinate scaffolds for osseous tissue engineering — X. Zhang, C. Zhang, et al. (2015)
- Internalization of Libby amphibole asbestos and induction of oxidative stress in murine macrophages — D.J. Blake, C.M. Bolin, et al. (2007)
- Behaviour of the new asbestos amphibole fluor-edenite in different lung cell systems — V. Cardile, M. Renis, et al. (2004)
- Differential activation of the inflammasome in THP-1 cells exposed to chrysotile asbestos and Libby "six-mix" amphiboles and subsequent activation of BEAS-2B cells — M. Li, M.E. Gunter, et al. (2012)
Browse return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
I. Fenoglio, M. Tomatis, B. Fubini. Spontaneous polymerisation on amphibole asbestos: relevance to asbestos removal. Chemical Communications 2001:2182-3. doi:10.1039/b106541f. PMID: 12240102.
Cite our summary
“Spontaneous polymerisation on amphibole asbestos: relevance to asbestos removal.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/spontaneous-polymerisation-on-amphibole-asbestos-relevance-to.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.