Union Carbide's Responses to Weldon R. Moake's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)

Union Carbide's discovery responses in Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, No. 90G2055, 239th Judicial District, Brazoria County, Texas, a premises case concerning Union Carbide's Seadrift, Texas plant. It lodges general and specific objections, admits that asbestos-containing products were used at Seadrift and that gaskets, pipe covering, boilers, fireproofing, joint compound and insulation were installed there, and says it lacks information on whether plaintiff worked there. Pages 41-48 were not provided.

People and organizations

From James H. Powers (Powers & Frost, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation d/b/a Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics, Inc.); Sharla J. Frost (Powers & Frost, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant) to Plaintiff's counsel (not named in the pages provided) (counsel for Weldon R. Moake and other plaintiffs).

• Sharla J. Frost (author)
• James H. Powers (author)
• Plaintiff's Counsel (recipient)
• Union Carbide Corporation (its organization)
• District Court (named)
• Owens-Corning Fiberglas (named)
• Powers & Frost, L.L.P (named)

Related pages

Pages on our site about what this document covers: Asbestos Gaskets and Mechanical Packing · Asbestos Joint Compound, Drywall Mud, and Texture Coatings · Asbestos insulation: pipe covering, block, and insulating cement · Owens-Corning Fiberglas · Texas Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage.

About this copy

This is document UC-1665 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 53 pages.