Union Carbide's Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Rehak v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Seadrift Facility) (2001)

Union Carbide's second amended responses and objections in Eugene A. Rehak et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. et al. (Calhoun County, Texas), answering plaintiff Werzecha's interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission about asbestos at Union Carbide's Seadrift, Texas facility. The responses state that asbestos insulation, gaskets and cement were used there until the early 1970s, that warning signs began in 1972, and that Union Carbide could not confirm whether the plaintiff was ever on the premises. Pages 41-82 were not provided.

People and organizations

From James H. Powers (Powers & Frost, L.L.P., attorneys for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation); Sharla J. Frost (Powers & Frost, L.L.P.); Gwendolyn S. Frost (Powers & Frost, L.L.P.) to William P. Werzecha, through his attorney Russell Budd, Baron & Budd, P.C. (Plaintiff).

• Gwendolyn S. Frost (author)
• Sharla J. Frost (author)
• James H. Powers (author)
• Union Carbide Corporation (its organization)
• Baron & Budd (named)
• Brown & Root (named)
• District Court (named)
• OSHA (named)
• Owens-Corning Fiberglas (named)
• Powers & Frost, L.L.P (named)

Related pages

Pages on our site about what this document covers: Asbestos Gaskets and Mechanical Packing · OSHA · OSHA Asbestos Standard · Owens-Corning Fiberglas · Texas Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage.

About this copy

This is document UC-2041 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 87 pages. The same document is also document UC-2040.