No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

1,307 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 31 of 66

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)

    …Cantor considered in her side-by side comparisons, she failed to fully appreciate the Union Carbide experience, which more closely resembled T & N's experience as it left the CCR at the same time as T…

  2. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bergstrom v. Welco Manufacturing Company (2015)

    …However, Strader testified he did not know when the authors of these letters acquired the information they put into these letters. The legal file also includes an internal memorandum from Union Carbide dated May 18, 1976…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …unquantified (and potentially infinitesimal) increase in risk could serve as proof that a defendant's product was a substantial cause of a plaintiff's or decedent's disease."); Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., 266 F. Supp…

  4. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …Minn. Jan. 27, 1992), overruled on other grounds by Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chems. & Plastics Co., 634 N.W.2d 401, 414 (Minn. 2001) (declining to adopt the Hahn opinion's interpretation of Minn. Stat…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 7, 2006 · in the opinion

    IN the Matter of United States Lines Inc. (2006)

    …Under New York law, the party invoking a statute of limitations bears the burden of proof for establishing such an affirmative defense. See Bano v. Union Carbide Corp., 361 F.3d 696, 710 (2d Cir. 2004)…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2021)

    …a claim for latent personal injury does not accrue until "the injured party discovers \[or could reasonably discover\] the primary condition on which the claim is based." Bano v. Union Carbide Corp., 361 F.3d 696…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)

    …Amcord, Inc. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 659 (Hernandez) and Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 (Izell), they argue that "evidence of exposure to dust from an asbestos-containing product is…

  8. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)

    …f/k/a Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Union Carbide Corp.; Brightwater; and Owens-Corning Fiberglass. Lorillard contested DeLisle's use of Kent cigarettes. DeLisle testified that he smoked on average a pack of Kent…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 17, 1985 · in the opinion

    Trimper v. Porter-Hayden (1985)

    …142 (1st Cir.1979) (Rhode Island statute); Bazdar v. Koppers Co., 524 F. Supp. 1194 (N.D.Ohio 1981); Stiles v. Union Carbide Corp., 520 F. Supp. 865 (S.D.Tex. 1981); Pollard v. United States…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 25, 2015 · in the opinion

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)

    …77 So.3d at 359) ("\[D\]r. Hammer need not know whether the asbestos concentrations at Union Carbide reached a particular level in order to offer an opinion as to causation."). In light of these decisions…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 2, 2013 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. Simpson Timber Company (2013)

    …Union Carbide was responsible for guarding against asbestos exposure. (Id. at p. 181.) The court relied on Olivo and concluded the independent contractor owed a duty to its employee's family members in spite of Union…

  13. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Stimson v. J-M Mfg. Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Ace Hardware Corp., 300 P.3d 202, 206 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). \[14\] Robinson v. Union Carbide Corp., 2019 WL 3822531, at [\11] (Del. Super. Aug. 15, 2019) (granting summary judgment where the record evidence showed…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hanson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2018)

    …cannot prove causation, required for each claim, as a matter of law. In an asbestos action, "causation is an essential element." Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 712 S.E.2d 537, 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)…

  15. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    McKENNEY'S Inc. v. Sinyard (2019)

    …evidence. Sinyard's expert Dr. Abraham testified that a person can contract mesothelioma by inhaling asbestos fibers. While this is not a novel proposition, see Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 310 Ga. App. 21, 25 (1)…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …a growing number of courts have recognized that the "every exposure" theory lacks sufficient support and have accordingly rejected such testimony. See, e.g., Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., 266 F. Supp. 3d 839, 849 (D…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 27, 2024 · in the opinion

    Burford v. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. (2024)

    …asbestos in the ambient air to which everyone is exposed. \[6\] Alcoa relies on the plurality opinion in Neely v. Union Carbide Corp. and cites a statement from the opinion as a statement by this court…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)

    …Aug. 16, 2018). On August 21, 2018, Union Carbide Corp. (individually and as successor to Amchem and Benjamin Foster) filed an Answer with affirmative defenses and special defenses, and cross-claims against all Defendants. Answer, ECF…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …It is the appellant's affirmative burden to demonstrate otherwise. \[Citation.\]" (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 33 (Stewart).) It is undisputed that Keeney served in the Navy for over 20…