No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 11, 1994 · in the opinion

    DiDio v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp. (1994)

    …Hence, although we vacate the judgment entered against Fibreboard, this does not affect the validity of the judgment entered against O-I. See, e.g., General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 437 Pa…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …Bubash v. Philadelphia Electric Company, 717 F.Supp. 297 (M.D.Pa.1989) (emotional distress resulting [\678] from fear of contracting cancer is not recoverable absent physical injury); Friedman v. General Electric Company, 706 F.Supp…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · April 24, 1997 · in the opinion

    Conway v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …Fed.Cir.1985); In re Upjohn Co. Antibiotic Cleocin Products Liability Litigation, 664 F.2d 114, 118 (6th Cir.1981); General Electric Co. v. Byrne, 611 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir.1979). Judge Weiner's…

  4. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 18, 1997 · in the opinion

    Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …of "Kaylo" asbestos insulation to OCF in 1958, has filed an amicus curiae brief in support of defendant OCF. General Electric Company, joined by various defendants in the Lockheed Litigation Cases, Los Angeles Coordination Proceedings No…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)

    …it is not within our purview to usurp [\766] the legislative function of the General Assembly or to overrule a decision of the Court of Appeals. Maryland Declaration of Rights and Maryland Constitution Amicus White Lung…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    …1094 (1991). Appellees acknowledge this general pronouncement of law but contend that retroactive application should only occur when the issue at the center of the change in law has been properly preserved for review. Certainly appellants…

  7. Medical study · Medical research · 1991

    Asbestos in strange places: two case reports of mesothelioma among merchant seamen

    The authors described two cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Greek merchant seamen. Both came from a mesothelioma registry in Greece and were seen at Sismanoglio General Hospital, Athens. The first was a 71-year-old…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · May 28, 1997

    McCormick v. CE Thurston & Sons, Inc. (1997)

    …aboard the ship. She sued through her ancillary administrator in Newport News state court under the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act and general maritime law, alleging a failure to warn. Thurston removed…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993

    Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)

    …had worked at the plant for sixteen to twenty-three years between 1956 and 1979. Most were general tireworkers who did not handle the products. The complaint and the doctors' testimony said the workers had asbestosis…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995 · in the opinion

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …the court was confronted with a complicated claim that General Motors' defective design of the wheel assembly and front floorboard enhanced the injuries the plaintiff suffered when another car collided with the left front wheel area…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    …emotional distress, intentional tort, conspiracy [\389] and loss of consortium; and sought general, special and punitive damages against no fewer than 215 named defendants and 300 unnamed does. Specifically, the complaint alleged that as a result…

  12. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · June 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motor., Inc. (1995)

    …intact. The dissent does not claim that the amendments changed the last injurious exposure rule enunciated in Meyer and Fossum. Instead, it attempts to assess the legislature's general intent. 135 Or.App. at 84. A…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Jenkins v. T & N Plc (1996)

    …defendants, including T&N. The complaint contained causes of action for strict liability and loss of consortium. In addition to general and special damages, the Jenkinses sought damages for loss of earnings, income and earning capacity. ...…

  14. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 5, 1999 · in the opinion

    Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters (1999)

    …be raised at any point in the proceeding. A preliminary motion is, therefore, necessary to assure the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. General Chem. Corp. v. De La Lastra, 852 S.W.2d 916…

  15. Court case · Oregon Supreme Court · July 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Beneficiaries of Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum (1997)

    …Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents on review Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc., and SAIF Corporation. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General. Before…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …that the defendants' products were located at shipyards where the Parks was overhauled, and were used by shipyard workers on ships in general, does not support a reasonable inference that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 23, 1999 · in the opinion

    Lambert v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1999)

    …we must address two issues. First, we must assess the general features of the type of incident involved to determine whether the incident had "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce." Id. (quoting Sisson v. Ruby…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    …evidence or the supposed inadequacies therein, with the single exception of one general objection based on hearsay contained in the declarations of counsel [\693] provided for use at the reasonableness hearing. Even that objection is not…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …state that he saw OCF's name on Kaylo boxes at the shipyard. But the questioning reverted back to general product trade names, and Durham was asked the time period that Kaylo products were customarily used…