No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

26 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the judgment for Watson's estate against Owens-Corning, upholding the compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury. A manufacturer has a duty to warn only if it knows…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · June 30, 1992

    O'banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgment entered on a jury verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. against Stanley and Louise O'Banion, finding no reversible error. A court may exclude cancer evidence under Rule 403 in…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 30, 1996

    Thalman v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1996)

    The appellate court affirmed the jury's damages award against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, reversed the trial judge's remittitur of the loss of consortium and wrongful death awards, and remanded for an amended judgment reflecting the…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Bradley McCauley sued Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Pittsburgh Corning and other companies in May 1993, alleging asbestos-related diseases from occupational exposure during work from 1947 to 1986 in construction, as a laborer and plumber. A 1985…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 29, 1999

    Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)

    The appellate court affirmed the $1.8 million jury verdict for plaintiff Shirley Spain against Owens Corning Fiberglass, rejecting its challenges to causation, evidence exclusion, the jury instruction, and the denial of a new trial or…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    Workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and families of those who died, sued makers of asbestos insulation products for diseases including lung cancer, colon cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, pleural disease and asbestosis. The jury, in a joint…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 16, 1993

    Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1993)

    William Giffear and his wife Paula sued asbestos product makers for physical injury and for fear and increased risk of cancer. Mr. Giffear said he was exposed to asbestos in the Navy starting in 1964, then as a plumber for about ten years, then as a…

  11. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 15, 1994

    Davies v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1994)

    The appellate court reversed the final judgment for Owens-Illinois after a jury verdict and remanded for a new trial, because excluding the Ames deposition was an abuse of discretion that favored the plaintiff, Frances Davies…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …Talc Co., 949 F.2d 167, 171 (5th Cir.1991); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir.1986); Zenson v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 836 F. Supp. 302, 304 (E…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    …Owens- Illinois Glass Company, Fibreboard Corporation, and Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc. Appeal of FIBREBOARD CORPORATION (at 3922). Joseph and Joanne WASSON v. KEENE CORPORATION, Fibreboard Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Raymark Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994 · in the opinion

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …for Combustion Engineering. Edwin A. Ellinghausen III, David L. Tolin, for Fibreboard Corporation. Louis G. Lemle for Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. James L. Pate, Ben Louis Mayeaux, for M.H. Detrick Co. [\386] Kenneth R. Spears…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …202 N.J.Super. 556, 495 A.2d 495 (1985); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., 507 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio Com.Pl.1987); Beeman v. Manville Corporation, 496 N.W.2d 247…

  16. Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · February 16, 1993 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Fenton (1993)

    …or knowable in light of the generally recognized and prevailing scientific and technical knowledge available at the time of manufacture and distribution. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Fibreboard Corp. (In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases, 1991)

    …jury's apportionment of responsibility was as follows: Owens-Illinois (6.5%); Fibreboard (6.5%); Pittsburgh-Corning (6.5%); Raymark Industries (13.2%); H.K. Porter Co. (5%); Eagle-Picher (3.5%); Owens-Corning Fiberglass (3%)…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 11, 1994 · in the opinion

    DiDio v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp. (1994)

    …A.2d 919 (1993). Secondly, regarding the severance of Owens-Illinois' crossclaims against settling defendants, I observe that the procedural mechanism of severance distinguishes this case from Deptula v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Company, 425 Pa.Super…

  19. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion

    Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)

    …see, e. g., Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp., 785 F. 2d 79, 85 (CA3 1986); Mauro v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 225 N. J. Super. 196, 542 A. 2d 16 (App. Div. 1988). But with only…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion

    Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …part, Consorti v. Armstrong World Indust., Inc., 72 F.3d 1003 (2d Cir.1995), vacated, Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., \_\_\_ U.S. \_\_\_, 116 S.Ct. 2576, 135 L.Ed.2d 1091 (1996), on remand, Consorti…