No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 28, 2008

    Williams v. American Optical Corporation (2008)

    A group of Florida plaintiffs, including a personal representative for Wayne Smith, sued American Optical and other companies for asbestosis, which is lung disease and pleural thickening from asbestos exposure. They filed suit before Florida's 2005…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    \[1\] The Complaint named as Defendants: Cardinal Industrial Insulation Company, Inc.; Triangle Insulation and Sheetmetal Co.; General Electric Company; ACandS Inc.; Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC; Anchor Packing; John Crane, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; RapidA-merican Corporation…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2007)

    …Dana Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; General Electric Company; Foster-Wheeling USA Corporation; Warren Pumps, Inc.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Borg-Warner Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; General Motors Corporation; and Genuine Parts Company. None…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2006)

    …CORPORATION, WALTER B. GALLAGHER CO., WEIL McLAIN CO., VIACOM/WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., ANCHOR PACKING CO., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., CROUSE-HINDS, DURAMETALLIC CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., HAJOCA PLUMBING CO., INGERSOLL RAND, STUDEBAKER-WORTHINGTON, INC., ZURN…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp. (2007)

    …Carbide Corporation, Walter B. Gallagher Co., Weil McLain Co., Viacom/Westinghouse Electric Corp., Anchor Packing Co., Combustion Engineering, Inc. Crouse-Hinds, Durametallic Corp., Garlock, Inc. General Electric Co., Hajoca Plumbing Co., Ingersoll Rand, Studebaker- Worthington, Inc…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · October 21, 2009 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2009)

    …CORPORATION, WALTER B. GALLAGHER CO., WEIL MCLAIN CO., VIACOM/WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., ANCHOR PACKING CO., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., CROUSE-HINDS, DURAMETALLIC CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., HAJOCA PLUMBING CO., INGERSOLL RAND, STUDEBAKER-WORTHINGTON, INC., ZURN…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …1141, 1145.) In 1978, the Supreme Court itself noted the seeming superiority of a term such as "\equitable apportionment or allocation of loss.'" (Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725, 736, 144 Cal…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2002 · in the opinion

    Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …Company, Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc., Studebaker Worthington, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Inc., WR Grace & Co., Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Fibreboard Corp., GAF Corporation. Appeal of: John Crane, Inc., Appellant…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion

    Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …69-70, 286 N.E.2d 454 (1972). See Barkanic v. General Admin. of Civil Aviation of the People's Republic of China, 923 F.2d 957, 963 (2d Cir.1991) (stating that New York courts…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …that courts consider whether the party seeking the withdrawal or amendment has acted with due diligence. In more general terms, courts should seek to ascertain whether the aggrieved party was careless in not timely filing its…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …Sparrows Point plant (steel mill); General Motors plant, Halethorpe; Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point, Sparrows Point; General Motors plant, Halethorpe, Halethorpe pipe fitter Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point Sparrows Point 1946-1979; warehouseman General Motors plant, Halethorpe Halethorpe

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Lustenring v. AC&S, Inc. (2004)

    …which were made with asbestos. Valid expert testimony indicated that such dust, raised from asbestos products and not just from industrial air in general, necessarily contains enough asbestos to cause mesothelioma. Defendant's factual disagreement with…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…

  15. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…

  16. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion

    Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)

    …of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion

    Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)

    …§§ 688, et seq., the General Admiralty and Maritime law, and traditional product liability law. ECF No. 1. Lindstrom claims that he contracted this disease as a result of his work-life exposures to asbestos and asbestos…

  18. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Werts v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)

    …tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance." Daubert at syllabus; see, also, Miller…

  19. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …1781. Once the term "substantial factor" is employed in the general negligence law [\826] vocabulary, there is the danger that it will be used not only to describe a general approach to the legal cause issue…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…