No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · July 2, 2003

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2003)

    Robert Jones sued John Crane, Inc. and seven other companies in 1996, alleging he developed mesothelioma from asbestos dust in their products. He died in 1997, and his wife, Laila Jones, took over the case and added wrongful death and loss of…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    James Scribner, a Navy veteran who later worked for a power company, developed mesothelioma and died in November 1995. He had sued, and his widow and children continued the case, against John Crane, Garlock and others. Scribner testified that in the…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2002 · in the opinion

    Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …H/W, Appellants, v. Raymark Industries, Inc., HK Porter Co., Inc., Eagle Picher Industries, Inc., Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., John Crane, Inc., Appellee, etal. Appeal of: James J. and Frances L. Greenhalgh, H/W. Edward C…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion

    Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …C and S, Inc., Combustion Engineering, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corporation, U.S. Mineral Products Co., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., The Flintkote Company, Rockwool Manufacturing Company, Anchor Packing Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Rapid-American…

  5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    …respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …the premises of plaintiff's workplace insufficient for liability to attach to defendant); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir. 1986) (same); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Co., 726 F. Supp…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp. (2007)

    …674 A.2d 232 (1996), and McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super.1998), indicate that a plaintiff who has already recovered damages for increased risk and fear of cancer may…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …to move. For example, this fluid makes it easier for the lungs to move during breathing." See American Cancer Society at http://www.cancer.org. As we noted in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (2000)

    …must bear the burden of establishing the equitable share of culpability attributable to each of the settling defendants. Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 A.D.2d 830, 633 N.Y.S.2d 884 (1995)…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …Cal.App.4th 847, 852-859, 97 Cal. Rptr.2d 240 (Wilson); Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 1197, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580.) Under Proposition 51, Crane is jointly…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …1986, section 1431.2 is the "heart" of Proposition 51, formally but less widely known as the Fair Responsibility Act of 1986. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 528, fn. 3…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …1992). Thus, we are not privy to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500…

  14. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …Cause in Actions of Tort," 25 Harv. L.Rev. 103 (1911). See Jeter v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 716 A.2d 633, 636(n.2) (Pa.Super 1998), citing Prosser & Keeton, On the Law of Torts…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion

    Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)

    …has suffered damages; and, 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich.1989); Stark…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2006)

    …would not have been affected by the plaintiff's previous claim for increased risk and fear of cancer. ¶ 9 Similarly, in McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super. 1998), this Court…

  17. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion

    Jurich v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …illness or disease. See e.g., Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 686 F.2d 570, 577 (7th Cir.1982) (A "cause of action accrues when the asbestos-caused disease becomes diagnosable—e.g., provable by…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · October 21, 2009 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2009)

    …to have been raised at the same time as their risk of cancer claims. Cancer and non-cancer diseases clearly give rise to separate claims. See McNeil v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp, 545 Pa. 209. 213…

  19. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Werts v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)

    …408, admission of evidence of settlements or settlement negotiations is prohibited when offered to prove liability, the invalidity of a claim, or the amount of a claim. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. American Centennial Ins. Co…

  20. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …Anchor Packing, Asbestos Spray, Pittsburgh Corning, and Owens-Corning. The jury awarded total damages in the amount of $4,611,492 and apportioned fault as follows: The district court filed its initial findings of fact, conclusions…