No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …He sued, claiming that the disease resulted from his exposure to the defendant's products during the period of [\736] 1962-63. Owens-Illinois, advancing the "manifestation" theory, argued that Armstrong's cause of action did…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 13, 2004 · in the opinion

    Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (2004)

    … A.W.CHESTERTON, INC., QUIGLEY CO., INC., PFIZER, INC.; GAF CORP.; RUBBERROID CO., INC.; OWENS ILLINOIS, INC.; FLEXITALLIC GASKET CO.; FLINTKOTE CO.; ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUS., INC.; U.S. GYPSUM CO.; PORTER HAYDEN CO.; FOSTER WHEELER CORP…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …economic loss are matters entrusted to the wide discretion of the trial judge. In terms of the width, the virtually boundless width, of "wide discretion," as recently as 1992 Owens-Illinois v. Zenobia, 325 Md. 420…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …Esq, Morgenstein & Jubelirer LLP, San Francisco, for Amicus Curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Certified for Partial Publication.\[\\] [\241] SEPULVEDA, J. This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs Lois and Daniel Wilson, Sr.\[1\] following a…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …for judgment only after it "consider\[s\] all evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made." Md. Rule 2-519(b); see also Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…

  6. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …has there been great difficulty and disparity in the courts' definition of "substantial factor." See, e. g., Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 16 Cal.4th 953, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (1997)…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weber v. John Crane, Inc. (2006)

    …the defendant with enough frequency and regularity as to show a reasonable medical probability that this exposure was a factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  8. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · July 2, 2003

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2003)

    Robert Jones sued John Crane, Inc. and seven other companies in 1996, alleging he developed mesothelioma from asbestos dust in their products. He died in 1997, and his wife, Laila Jones, took over the case and added wrongful death and loss of…

  9. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …Inc., Appellant. No. A08-1715. June 23, 2009. Anchor Packing 10% Asbestos Spray 5% Chesterton 10% Crane 55% Garlock 10% Owens-Corning 5% Pittsburgh Corning 5% Court of Appeals of Minnesota. Richard A. LaVerdiere, Michael R…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2002 · in the opinion

    Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …H/W, Appellants, v. Raymark Industries, Inc., HK Porter Co., Inc., Eagle Picher Industries, Inc., Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., John Crane, Inc., Appellee, etal. Appeal of: James J. and Frances L. Greenhalgh, H/W. Edward C…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion

    Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …JOHN CRANE, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, A C and S, Inc., Combustion Engineering, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corporation, U.S. Mineral Products Co., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., The Flintkote Company, Rockwool Manufacturing Company, Anchor…

  12. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    …respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (2000)

    …must bear the burden of establishing the equitable share of culpability attributable to each of the settling defendants. Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 A.D.2d 830, 633 N.Y.S.2d 884 (1995)…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …attach to defendant); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir. 1986) (same); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Co., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989) (same). F. John Crane…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …packing materials, gaskets, and insulation furnished by many other manufacturers, including Garlock, Owens Corning, and Johns-Manville. Lewis began to exhibit symptoms of lung disease in April 1998. Diagnostic tests indicated that Lewis had mesothelioma, an…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp. (2007)

    …674 A.2d 232 (1996), and McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super.1998), indicate that a plaintiff who has already recovered damages for increased risk and fear of cancer may…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …to move. For example, this fluid makes it easier for the lungs to move during breathing." See American Cancer Society at http://www.cancer.org. As we noted in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343…

  18. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Werts v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)

    …408, admission of evidence of settlements or settlement negotiations is prohibited when offered to prove liability, the invalidity of a claim, or the amount of a claim. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. American Centennial Ins. Co…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion

    Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)

    …has suffered damages; and, 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich.1989); Stark…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2006)

    …would not have been affected by the plaintiff's previous claim for increased risk and fear of cancer. ¶ 9 Similarly, in McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super. 1998), this Court…