655 results for “General Electric”, page 29 of 33
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · November 9, 2006 · in the opinion
Correll v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co. (2006)
…would result in the elimination of the Social Security credit passed by the General Assembly in death cases. The General Assembly determined that persons over 60 had restricted periods for recovery and reduced benefits based upon…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)
…441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 26, 2006 · in the opinion
Blandford v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2006)
…also found that when a complaining party knows the identity of the other party's expert, the subject of his expertise and the general nature of his testimony, a party cannot complain that they are ambushed…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2008 · in the opinion
Whitlock v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2008)
…Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 859 \["\[A\]s a general matter, orders granting a new trial are examined for abuse of discretion."\].) (Italics added.) Further, as "\[t\]he standard for review of an…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 30, 2004 · in the opinion
Gilbert v. Monsey Products Company (2004)
…1988). In this case, I find the general principles of Eckenrod applicable. Where appellant himself testified about his exposure to the appellees' products and provided sufficient evidence of product identification, the trial court's grant of…
-
Court case · Virginia Court of Appeals · August 27, 2002 · in the opinion
Robertson v. DuPONT (2002)
…Williams to apply the special method for calculating average weekly wage set out in Code § 65.1-52 rather than the general method in Code § 65.1-6\[4\] may be explained by the fact that…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 11, 2003 · in the opinion
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. (2003)
…of law; the inquiry is whether the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from general principles of fault) to support the claim that the defendant owed him a duty. Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 98…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 30, 2008 · in the opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau (2008)
…early 1970s banning the use of asbestos-containing products. The subject insurance policies are 17 primary level comprehensive general liability (hereinafter referred to as CGL) policies that were issued by CNA to Keasbey between February 1970…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)
…probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Congoleum Corporation (2009)
…issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a pre-packaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2004 · in the opinion
Gibson v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board (2004)
…We note that, in general, questions concerning the admission and exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the tribunal and are not to be reversed on appeal absent a finding of an abuse of…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 1, 2000 · in the opinion
Burgess v. Abex Corp. EX rel. Pneumo Abex (2000)
…787, 720 N.E.2d at 258), but did not comment on, Adcock\s statement: "A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees, either explicitly or implicitly\[,\] to do…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…was proximately caused by his exposure to asbestos-containing products provided by the Defendants. The Indiana General Assembly has enacted two statutes that limit the period of time within which individuals can file product liability claims…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)
…612. The Supreme Court struck down the state law, reasoning that: \[T\]he power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Ross v. Union Carbide Corporation (2009)
…the parties also stated their intentions in broad but general terms: It is the intent and purpose of this agreement that at no time will the Releasees be called upon to pay any further sum or…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion
Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)
…bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 27, 2006 · in the opinion
Hopkins v. Plant Insulation Company (2006)
…at 1079. Like federal habeas law, federal bankruptcy law creates exceptions to the general rule of federal deference to state court judgments by empowering bankruptcy courts to avoid or modify state judgments. Id. For certain bankruptcy…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 8, 2007 · in the opinion
Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores (2007)
…REV. RESPIRATORY DISEASE 363, 363-68 (1996)). One text notes that: There is general agreement from epidemiologic studies that the development of asbestosis requires heavy exposure to asbestos. . . in the range of 25 to 100 fibers…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 10, 2008 · in the opinion
Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)
…precondition of proving coverage" and, consequently, a duty of HSB to indemnify Levert. We disagree. As a general rule, the one seeking indemnity must establish actual liability to recover. Terra Resources v. Lake Charles Dredging & Towing…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion
In re Usg Corp. (2003)
…In In re USG Corporation, one sees these general truths played out in detail. The debtors argues that "\[t\]he vast majority of asbestos personal injury suits filed today are meritless nonmalignant claims of minor pleural…