No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

655 results for “General Electric”, page 30 of 33

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · March 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Greenburg v. Hiner (2005)

    …Plaintiffs complain that Defendants' representations concerning OC's financial state in general and their affirmative representations regarding the company's asbestos liability and the NSP in particular were fraudulent because they omitted material information necessary to…

  2. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …1781. Once the term "substantial factor" is employed in the general negligence law [\826] vocabulary, there is the danger that it will be used not only to describe a general approach to the legal cause issue…

  3. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 20, 2006 · in the opinion

    DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Ferrante (2006)

    …2d 592 (1986). If, however, "\the objectionable part is so connected with the general scope of the statute that, should it be stricken out, effect cannot be given to the legislative intent, the rest of the…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 10, 2004 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Thiokol Corp. (2004)

    …cancer, while others have differing ailments; thus, the reason for this case. Plaintiffs filed suit for general, specific and punitive damages, as well as medical monitoring. PROCEDURAL FACTS Plaintiffs filed suit on July 9, 1999, alleging…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    O'connor v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (2007)

    …behalf. (Compl. ¶¶ 5-6, 8, 11-15.) These general allegations of injury, suffice at this early stage of the litigation. See White Tail Park, 413 F.3d at 459 (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …in sanding the tiles. Also, there was no evidence of a general nature. There was no evidence as to what type of tiles would have been used in Iran 35 years ago. There was no evidence…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · March 1, 2001 · in the opinion

    Mackie v. Young Sales Corp. (2001)

    …related injury has resulted in the employee's death, workers' compensation benefits are to be paid to the surviving dependents of the employee. Jones v. General Accident Ins. Co. of America, 856 S.W.2d 133…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · October 29, 2008 · in the opinion

    Dukes v. Pneumo Abex Corporations (2008)

    …study. When Saranac's 1948 report showed findings of cancer and tumors, those companies forced Saranac to remove the references before publication. In 1935, the general counsel of J-M convinced a researcher, Dr. A.J…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 4, 2005 · in the opinion

    Riverwood International Corp. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau (2005)

    …under the Policies. Under Louisiana law, an insurance policy is a contract between the parties, and it should be construed according to the general rules of contract interpretation set forth in the Civil Code. La. Ins…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · March 14, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kozak v. Guard-Line, Inc. (2008)

    …time of removal\[.\]" Id. at 264 (emphasis added). This court has adhered to the general rule that "some subsequent developments in a case do not affect a court's prior-existing jurisdiction." Garcia v. Boyar & Miller…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 4, 2001 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2001)

    …course, the general principle is that statutes enacted after the acquisition of a vested property right cannot be applied retroactively so as to divest the plaintiff of his cause of action without violating due process guarantees…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 22, 2006 · in the opinion

    Creech v. Agco Corporation (2006)

    …Corporation when it bought the Kewanee boiler division assets from American Standard. The general rule in Washington is that a corporation purchasing the assets of another corporation does not, by reason of the purchase of assets…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …that economic theories which attempt to extrapolate the "value" of human life from various studies of wages, costs, etc., have no place in the calculation of general damages. See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …28, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 518.) Section 361 Requires Application of Indiana Law In general, whether a claim is barred by a statute of limitations "is a procedural matter governed by the law of the forum…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · September 25, 2006 · in the opinion

    Jacobs v. Tapscott (2006)

    …defendants posit that, despite Hendrix's deposition testimony that he was not expressing an opinion on the general value of mesothelioma cases or on the Jacobs Litigation, in his supplemental letter he opines that no one…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …booster pumps, the bilge pumps, and fire and flushing pumps. Cunningham would have had technical manuals for such products available. In general, the manufacturers would provide their equipment to the shipyard, which would assemble, install, and…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion

    Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)

    …trial, district court entered a judgment on the jury verdict for the vessel owner, but granted the widow's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and awarded general and special damages. The vessel owner appealed…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 11, 2000 · in the opinion

    In re Patenaude (2000)

    …the instant case, where the possibility exists that even individual settlement negotiations will be more efficient if facilitated by a judge who is intimately familiar with the general issues and many of the parties, and where…

  20. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · August 11, 2005 · in the opinion

    Gorman-Rupp Company v. Hall (2005)

    …asbestos products caused the plaintiff's injuries. (emphasis added). ¶21. In Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361 (Ark. 2002), the Arkansas Supreme Court adopted a test to determine the admissible evidence that…