No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · November 22, 2006 · in the opinion

    Putzel Elect. Contractors v. Jones (2006)

    …under such employer, was contracted while the employee was so engaged, and has resulted from a hazard characteristic of the employment in excess of the hazards of such disease attending employment in general. OCGA § 34-9…

  2. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 14, 2001

    Hoffman v. AC&S, Inc. (2001)

    …site at some unspecified time during the 1960s is insufficient. An expert's general opinion that workers were exposed to asbestos products does not supply the missing link to a particular defendant. Product Identification; Expert Testimony…

  3. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …1781. Once the term "substantial factor" is employed in the general negligence law [\826] vocabulary, there is the danger that it will be used not only to describe a general approach to the legal cause issue…

  4. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 20, 2006 · in the opinion

    DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Ferrante (2006)

    …2d 592 (1986). If, however, "\the objectionable part is so connected with the general scope of the statute that, should it be stricken out, effect cannot be given to the legislative intent, the rest of the…