14 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017
McClung v. 3M Company (2017)
The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015
Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)
The district court denied summary judgment to Boeing, Cessna and General Electric, granted and denied the motions in limine in part, and allowed Boeing to file a late government contractor defense motion. The court did not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)
…known as VIACOM, Inc., formerly known as WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.; CERTAIN-TEED CORP.; CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Clark v. Aii Acquisition, LLC (2018)
…Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees, The Boeing Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec LLC, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company, Goodyear Canada, INC., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Harco LLC, fka Harco Laboratories, Inc., Henkel Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)
…under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)
…gross negligence, yet short of premeditated and deliberate harm). Our holding in Birklid interprets the intentional tort consistently with general tort principles while still keeping in mind the IIA's purpose of balancing competing interests. 127…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…proposed solution. Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cautioned that it "would not direct the substantive common law away from well-established general norms in the absence of some clear predominance of policy justifications." Lance v. Wyeth…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 14, 2015 · in the opinion
Boyd v. Boeing Co. (2015)
…3d at 398 (quoting Mesa, 489 U.S. at 139). Prior decisions analyzing what constitutes federal direction have required more than "general auspices" of a federal officer, or participation in a regulated industry. Mouton v. Flexitallic…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · October 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co., Inc. (2014)
…removal pursuant to Section 1442(a)(1). DISCUSSION I. Federal Officer Removal Jurisdiction A. Legal Standard "\[T\]he general rule that federal courts have an ever present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction. . …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Walston v. Boeing Company (2013)
…individuals will develop \[m\]esothelioma" or other asbestos related diseases. CP at 2855. Mesothelioma is extremely rare in the general population, including exposed workers. But among certain groups of workers with the highest cumulative asbestos exposure…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Betzner v. Boeing Co. (2018)
…removal. The general statute governing the removal of civil actions requires a defendant to file a notice of removal "containing a short and plain statement of the grounds of removal." Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Filipek v. the Boeing Company (2017)
…NO. 23: Admit that Plaintiff Marlin Filipek was diagnosed with an asbestos- related disease prior to May 19, 2010. ANSWER: Plaintiffs incorporate by reference General Objections 1-8. Subject to and without waiving these objections, admit…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Burns v. All Acquisitions, LLC (2014)
…alleging state law claims and there does not appear to be diversity of citizenship. "The well established general rule is that jurisdiction is determined at the time of removal and nothing filed after removal affects jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Thrash v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC (2017)
…749 F.3d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 2014) ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp…