584 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 13 of 30
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)
…along on every draft of air (and here we are looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we must do (see McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · November 4, 2015 · in the opinion
Folta v. Ferro Engineering (2015)
…exposed to asbestos in the workplace for 40 years, died after being diagnosed with mesothelioma, and his widow was entitled to recover benefits); Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n, 198 Ill.App.3d 605…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · March 9, 2017 · in the opinion
Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (2017)
…Illinois for Defendant-Appellant Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C. Benno Ashrafi, Tyler Stock, and Josiah Parker, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. Before: Milan D. Smith, Jr. and John B. Owens…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Bowens v. Sager Corp. (In re All Cases Against Sager Corp., 2012)
…court, relying on a California statute, held that a dissolved Illinois corporation could be sued in California. We recognize that a contrary decision has been rendered by a different California appellate court in Greb v. Diamond…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Betzner v. Boeing Co. (2018)
…Argued December 3, 2018. Decided December 14, 2018. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, No. 3:18-cv-01294 — Staci M. Yandle…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)
…interest, in any rule of the common law," nevertheless, "\[r\]ights of property which have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due process." Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113, 134…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · May 20, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Specialty Products Holding Corp. (2013)
…future mesothelioma claims caused by exposure to the Debtors' asbestos.\[2\] In estimation proceedings the Court is to determine that number based on the Debtors' tort system claiming history. Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…"a person owes a duty of care to another person whenever the circumstances place the one person in a position towards the other person such that an ordinary prudent person would recognize that if he or…
-
Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Kruse v. Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC (2015)
…one element of causation,'... the \threshold requirement of any products liability action is identification of the injury-causing product and its manufacturer.'" Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 450 (Ala.1992) (citations…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. Ronald Dummitt v. AW Chesterton (2012)
…In re New York Asbestos Litigation (Marshall), supra at 256 (citing Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation (Ronsini), supra; Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp, 221 AD2d 830 \[3rd Dept 1995\]; Bigelow v. Acands, Inc…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 2011
Conti v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2011)
Eight plaintiffs, each of whom had or has lung cancer or mesothelioma from asbestos exposure, asked the New York County Supreme Court to try their cases together. All but one, David Giancarlo, had died. They named defendants including Crane Co. and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Wittman v. Coty, Inc. (2018)
…that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owen-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion
Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)
…that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owen-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 4, 2013 · in the opinion
Barile v. 3M Company, Inc. (2013)
…that has engaged an independent contractor to do work upon its premises has a duty to provide a reasonably safe workplace for an employee of that independent contractor. Olivo v. Ownes-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)
…Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 71, 79, quoting Rutherford v. Owen-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976, fn. 11 (Rutherford).) California applies the substantial factor test to so-called "cause-in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 8, 2015
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2015)
…ended before the marriage, but denied it to Georgia-Pacific. A defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the asbestos exposure occurred, and insurance-policy…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)
…in this case, but also in all of the other cases involving claims against Kone for injury due to asbestos exposure. Accordingly, we find that Illinois Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (eff. Mar. 8, 2016) gives…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · July 14, 2014
Smith v. Crane Co. (2014)
…because she married Kenneth after his alleged asbestos exposure. Under Illinois appellate decisions (Monroe and Gillenwater), a defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…where its valves needed asbestos components to function and those parts would be replaced with similar materials, but it owes no such duty for third-party insulation it did not supply. Product Identification; Failure to Warn…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Harrow Industries LLC v. Nexus Corporation (2018)
…NEXUS CORPORATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant. No. 3:17-cv-3222. February 21, 2018. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. Harrow Industries LLC, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Michael W. Drumke, SWANSON…