585 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 26 of 30
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 29, 2019 · in the opinion
In re Bestwall LLC (2019)
…can be addressed in the plan confirmation process. Even outside of the Funding Agreement, Bestwall owns substantial assets and operating businesses that produce cash flow. These include bank accounts that contain approximately $20 million in cash…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…whether a union pension or otherwise; and (c) life insurance proceeds. CBS concedes that this evidence is barred by the collateral source rule, unless the plaintiff opens the door for impeachment purposes. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Tetteh v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. (2016)
…he has undertaken a duty which the other owes to the third person."\[38\] A plaintiff must establish that the defendant "completely undertook to perform duties," such as "maintaining safe equipment and preventing injuries," that were…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Bernard v. Brookfield Props. Corp. (2011)
…were not extinguished insofar as same would have denied her due process, and in light of NWSC's admission that it currently owns the Building, there remain outstanding issues of fact as to NWSC's status…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)
…Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wn.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wn.2d at 787. \[14\] Lybbert v. Grant…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 27, 2010 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2010)
…Inc. (FMP). FMP now owes to Pneumo Abex the indemnity that was originally provided by Wagner in the 1994 APA. The obligations that arise from the relationship with Cooper are twofold. The first concerns a guaranty…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)
…possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · March 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Ltd. v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2017)
…Association, Defendant, represented by Stephen W. Glusman, Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission, Brandie Mendoza Thibodeaux, Swetman Baxter Massenburg, Christopher Owen Massenburg, Swetman Baxter Massenberg, LLC, Glenn Lyle Maximilian Swetman, Manion Gaynor & Manning, LLC, Jeanette Seraile Riggins…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…2:17-CV-12367. Before: JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.\[\\] This case is the latest in an ever-increasing line of cases brought by former Huntington Ingalls employees or their family members in…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)
…Myers, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. W. Thomas McGough, Jr. (argued), Robert H. Owen, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee Railroad Friction Products Corporation. Daniel Markewich (argued), Ellen G. Margolis, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, New York…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)
…to Kone for 1977 to 1985 count as excess insurance, and Lamorak owes nothing on those policies until Kone exhausts the limits of all applicable primary insurance. We must decide whether the Lamorak policies at issue…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Rogers Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2017)
…he identified one of Green Tweed's products as being a potential cause of his exposure. He testified that rope on the leveler doors of the coke ovens at U.S. Steel was manufactured by Palmetto…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Aston v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Harrow Industries LLC v. Nexus Corporation (2018)
…In Count II, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant owes Plaintiff a contractual duty to defend and indemnify Plaintiff against any claims arising after the closing date of the Agreement. Defendant has purportedly breached its contractual obligations by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 3, 2016 · in the opinion
US v. Silver (2016)
…38. When Steven Witkoff, who owns eighty-five percent of the Witkoff Group, learned that its fees to Goldberg & Iryami were being shared with Silver, he was furious because he believed the arrangement could be illegal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…