33 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 27, 2012
Pease v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The district court adopted the Special Master's report, rejected Crane Company's objections, and denied Crane's second motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs' claims against Crane continued. A transferee MDL court's earlier…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 21, 2017
Walls v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asebestos Litigation, 2017)
…affirmed the Superior Court's judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding any error in the partial summary judgment on third-party replacement brake parts was harmless because the jury found Ford not negligent. An error in…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · December 2, 2019
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Ford's motion for judgment as a matter of law and its inconsistent-verdict challenge, but reversed on the excessive-damages ruling and remanded so the Superior Court…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The Delaware Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, its alternative motion for a new trial, and its motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 19, 2013
Farrall v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2013)
…plaintiff's motion for reargument, leaving in place its grant of summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on the failure to warn claim about asbestos-containing replacement parts. Under Delaware law, a manufacturer has no duty…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 12, 2018
Call v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
The court granted Ford Motor Company's motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Marilyn Kay Call, holding Indiana's "but for" causation standard applies and her expert's opinion did not meet it. Indiana's general…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion on the negligence, failure-to-warn and punitive damages claims, because Johansen's brake exposure was de minimis and Ford owed no duty to…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Copes-Vulcan, Ford and Goodyear and the denial of the Richards' request to supplement their expert report or for reargument. Under Ohio law, Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.96…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
Charlevoix performed clutch and gasket work on Ford vehicles owned by family and friends. (D.I. 216, Ex. 3 at 152:16-19) However, Mr. Milligan could not recall the manufacturer of any clutches or gaskets…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 8, 2018
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Fairbanks, Ford and Goodyear. A party seeking to supplement an expert report after summary judgment must show good cause or excusable neglect, and plaintiffs who never sought leave before judgment was entered did not do so…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)
…Singewald, White & Williams. Ford Motor Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Christian J. Singewald, White & Williams. CBS Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Shawn Edward Martyniak, Swartz Campbell LLC. Caterpillar Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Fiat Allis North America, Cross Defendant, represented by Peter S. Murphy, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. Ford Motor Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Christian J. Singewald, White & Williams. John Crane Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by Jonathan…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion
Genuine Parts Company v. Cepec (2016)
…half of all U.S. publicly traded companies and 65% of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware."). \[111\] Daimler, 134 S. Ct. at 761. \[112\] See, e.g., Pitts v. Ford Motor Co., 127 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Defendants, represented by Kelly A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. Siemens Industry, Inc., successor in interest to Siemens…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Pavlick v. AM General (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2014)
…at 117-18.) Moreover, Mr. DiLoretto repeatedly established that the trucks could have been assembled by any number of possible manufacturers: Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, and "maybe American Motors \[AM General\]." (DiLoretto Dep. at 107, 111…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 27, 2010 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2010)
…including Volvo, NAPCO, Mack Truck, International Harvester, General Motors, Ford, Dodge, Clark Equipment, Chrysler Canada, American Motors Corporation, and Disneyland. Wagner friction products were distributed and sold nationwide under the brand names Comax, Wagner Comax, Wagner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)
…expert must testify about matters requiring scientific, technical or specialized knowledge; and (3) the expert's testimony must assist the trier of fact." Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 520 F.3d 237, 244 (3d Cir. 2008)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)
…by Captain Moore in forming his opinion regarding Navy warning requirements do not have the requisite "fit" to assist the trier of fact. See Oddi v. Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 145 (3d Cir…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Davis v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
…Ford Motor Co., 2010 WL 3005539 (Del. Super. July 30, 2010), which held that Ford was not entitled to summary judgment under Pennsylvania law on a failure-to-warn claim where there were genuine factual disputes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
…D. Delaware. [\816] Laura M. Cabutto, David W. deBruin, The deBruin Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiffs. Eileen M. Ford, Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wilmington, DE, for Defendants…