18 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 20, 2015
Oddo v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2015)
…affirmed Ford's liability, reallocated fault to Ford 65%, Union Carbide 25% and Higgins 10%, and amended the survival damages award against Ford, so the plaintiffs lost against Southern Talc but kept their judgment against Ford…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…Corp.; Deere & Co.; Dorsey Trailers Inc.; Eaton Corp.; Fontaine Trailer Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Fruehauf Corp.; Gardner Denver Inc.; Genuine Parts Company Inc.; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps Incorporated; Grinnel Corp.; Harley Davidson Inc.…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…J., dissenting). In some cases, it has proven difficult to apply. See, e.g., Stockton v. Ford Motor Company, No. W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 2021760, at [\12]-15 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed May…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)
…by a family member who laundered asbestos-contaminated work clothes. In Campbell, the plaintiff filed a premises liability action against Ford Motor Company, alleging she contracted mesothelioma as a result of her secondary exposure to asbestos…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (2017)
…she laundered. In our prior decision in this matter (Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (Nov. 21, 2014, B256407) \[nonpub. opn.\] (Beckering I)), guided by Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…cases applying a "modified or adjusted" Lohrmann test in mesothelioma cases and rejecting them as inconsistent with a prediction that the North Carolina Supreme Court would adopt the Lohrmann test); see also Ford Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)
…810 (Tex. 2005). More than a scintilla of evidence exists when the evidence rises to a level that would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to differ in their conclusions. Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway, 135…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)
…of Brennan, J.); see also Turcott v. Ford Motor Co. (1st Cir. 1974) 494 F.2d 173, 173-174.) \[14\] Because we conclude that under California's choice-of-law principles the law of Oklahoma should…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)
…C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)
…1992); United States v. Dixon, 413 F.3d 520, 524-25 (5th Cir. 2005); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015); Betz v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 615…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
…the "single fiber" theory, and the "each and every exposure" theory. See, e.g., Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015). \[12\] Ms. Barabin takes issue with…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)
…408, 421 \[generally, state has no legitimate interest in imposing punitive damages for out-of-state conduct\]; Aguirre Cruz v. Ford Motor Co. (W.D. Tenn. 2006) 435 F.Supp.2d 701, 705-706 \[collecting cases…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2014 · in the opinion
Groover v. CBS Corporation (2014)
…ELECTRIC COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, CONOCO PHILLIPS COMPANY, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., BP AMERICA, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARCO CHEMICAL. No. 680 EDA 2013. Filed April 24, 2014. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
…gasket from a vehicle on one occasion, when he overhauled a 1957 Ford.\[14\] He could not identify any other specific occasion where he had used a Victor gasket, nor was he able to identify the…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AJ Friedman Supply Co. (2010)
…Company, Inc., Valtek Control Valves, and Wilson-Snyder Pumps, Ford, Bacon & Davis, Incorporated, Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Furino & Sons, Inc., Garlock, Inc., General Refractories, Co., General Electric Co., Georgia Pacific, Inc., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)
…is essentially an immunity from suit, or whether it is based on a predicate determination the conduct in question is not wrongful under the law. Subsequent cases illustrate this distinction. In Ford v. Polaris Industries, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Thomasson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…NJ, for Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Christopher J. Keale, Esq., SEGWICK LLP, Newark, NJ, for Defendants Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. f/k/a Borg-Warner Corporation. Christopher S. Kozak, Esq., LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD PC…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
… thus, it must be claimed and may be waived \[citation\]."\]; People v. Ford (1988) 45 Cal.3d 431, 439 \["The privilege against self-incrimination is, of course, personal and may be asserted only by the holder…