No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

141 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 8

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 3, 2014

    Whalen v. General Electric Corporation (2014)

    The court denied General Dynamics' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' strict products liability claim and denied its motion to strike the punitive damages prayer as moot, so the Whalens' claims proceeded. Under maritime law, a complaint…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · August 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Lund v. 3M Company (2016)

    …district court case, Defendants argued that a Navy ship should not be considered a "product" for purposes of a strict liability claim. (Id. (citing Mack v. General Electric Co., 896 F. Supp. 2d 333, 345 (E…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · October 25, 2016

    Ballard v. Ameron International Corporation (2016)

    …part of the exposure. Enclave jurisdiction would also require all defendants to join the removal, and General Electric had said it did not consent. Ameron had made no showing for federal officer removal. The court also…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 10, 2015

    Hendricks v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2015)

    …Hendricks plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court, finding General Electric failed to show SoCal Edison was fraudulently joined and did not obtain consent of all remaining defendants to removal; GE lost. A resident defendant is…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · February 25, 2019

    Harris v. CBS Corporation (2019)

    Michael Roy Harris and his wife Elsie sued CBS Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand (IR) and other companies in California state court in Alameda County. They brought personal injury and loss of consortium claims. Michael Harris has malignant mesothelioma,…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 3, 2019

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    Debbie Viale and Amber Jacobs sued Air & Liquid Systems (successor to Buffalo Pumps), Foster Wheeler, GE, Calaveras and other companies in California state court. They alleged Ronald Viale developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure at several…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 21, 2019

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    Debbie Viale, individually and as representative of the estate of Ronald Viale, and Amber Jacobs sued many companies, alleging that Mr. Viale was exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products at various work sites and developed mesothelioma,…

  8. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …suppliers "to develop expertise regarding a multitude of different end-products and to investigate the actual use of raw materials by manufacturers over whom the supplier has no control." (Ibid.) Artiglio v. General Electric Co., supra…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · August 6, 2012 · in the opinion

    Harris v. CBS Corporation (2012)

    …Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 383, 112 S. Ct. 2031, 2036 (1992); English v. General Electric Company, 496 U.S. 72, 78-79, 110 S. Ct. 2270, 2275 (1990); Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co., 485…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gottschall v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …Johnson court's explicit approval of the reasoning of the federal court in In re Related Asbestos Cases. \[Johnson, supra,\] 43 Cal.4th at 69-70." (Gottschall v. General Electric (E.D.Pa., Dec. 9, 2011…

  11. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …981 P.2d 978\]; cf. Artiglio v. General Electric Co., supra, 61 Cal.App.4th at pp. 838-839 \[foreseeability of harm from a finished product is not sufficient to impose a duty to warn on…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …which specifies when a supplier of goods is subject to liability for providing dangerous items lacking suitable warnings to users either "\directly or through a third person.'"\[2\] (Mack v. General Electric Co. (E.D.Pa…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …whether substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that a suitable forum exists. (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.) Here appellants claim the lower court erred in finding that…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Honeywell International Inc. (2019)

    …by Daniel James Kelly, Tucker Ellis LLP & Nicole Elisabet Gage, Tucker Ellis LLP. Fryer-Knowles Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles Stewart Bishop, Sinunu Bruni LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Derek S. Johnson, WFBM, LLP…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wittman v. Coty, Inc. (2018)

    …747, 771, italics omitted.) Where this showing is lacking, "\there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered.'" (Ibid., quoting General Electric Co. v. Joiner (1997) 522 U.S. 136…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2015 · in the opinion

    Marteney v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …product, provided that their own parts or material were nondefective, and they did not exercise control over the end product. (Artiglio v. General Electric. Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 838-840.) In Walker, the…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Viking Pump (In re Toy Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …by Daniel James Kelly, Tucker Ellis LLP & Nicole Elisabet Gage, Tucker Ellis LLP. Fryer-Knowles Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles Stewart Bishop, Sinunu Bruni LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Derek S. Johnson, WFBM, LLP…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …Inc, Defendant, represented by Jennifer Denise Fitzpatrick, Dehay & Elliston, LLP. Exxonmobile Corporation, Defendant, represented by Susan A. Ogdie, DeHay & Elliston LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Derek S. Johnson, WFBM, LLP, Charles T. Sheldon, WFBM…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 10, 2013

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2013)

    The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's judgment notwithstanding the verdict for Special Electric and directed that the original judgment on the jury's verdict for the Webbs be reinstated, with one justice dissenting…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2018)

    …Special Electric's insurers published a "Notice of Dissolution of Special Electric Company, Inc." (Notice) in three Wisconsin newspapers of general circulation, purportedly triggering a two-year statutory period to bring any claims against Special Electric…