25 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · November 7, 2016 · in the opinion
Hovsepian v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2016)
…AND CARLSON. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Anita Maria Kidd, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Julie Fix Meyer, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Melanie R. King, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP & Raymond R. Fournie, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP. General Gasket Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · November 8, 2016 · in the opinion
Hovsepian v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2016)
…AND CARLSON. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Anita Maria Kidd, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Julie Fix Meyer, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Melanie R. King, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP & Raymond R. Fournie, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP. General Gasket Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · August 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Hovsepian v. Crane Co. (2016)
…AND CARLSON. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Anita Maria Kidd, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Julie Fix Meyer, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Melanie R. King, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP & Raymond R. Fournie, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP. General Gasket Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 6, 2012
Brauer Supply Company 542 (G) Asbestos Personal Injury Trust v. Atlanta International Ins. Co. (2012)
The Brauer Supply Company 542(g) Asbestos Personal Injury Trust sued several insurers in a declaratory judgment action in federal court in Missouri. It sought a ruling that it was entitled to proceeds of insurance policies covering many underlying…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 21, 2017
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…on reconsideration, found it lacked general or specific personal jurisdiction over CBS in Missouri, a loss for the plaintiffs. Missouri's foreign corporation registration statute does not constitute consent to general personal jurisdiction, per State ex…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 15, 2019
Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)
…only Missouri defendant. Johnson & Johnson then asked the court to dismiss the case for improper venue or transfer it to the Eastern District of Tennessee, relying on the general venue statute and § 1406. The court denied…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · February 14, 2019
Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)
…sister company is generally not liable for another company's acts absent a pleaded alter ego or agency theory, and general allegations of commonality do not plead alter ego under Delaware law. Product Identification; Successor Liability…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 13, 2011 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Kcp&l Greater Missouri Operations Company v. Cook (2011)
…the statutes. Essentially, it was an express affirmation that the Court in Staples correctly determined the General Assembly's legislative intent. In 1974, the legislature amended the Act to make coverage for occupational diseases mandatory. The…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)
…must adduce sufficient evidence to support every essential element of a claim to make a submissible case). The general test for proximate cause is whether an injury is "a reasonable and probable consequence" of a defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…. ." \[Doc. \#333-1, at 18-19\]. \[2\] Hovsepian claimed breach of warranty under Massachusetts General Laws ch. 106, § 2-318. He argued that "the defendants expressly and impliedly warranted that the asbestos and asbestoscontaining products and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 28, 2014 · in the opinion
Pickard v. Dap, Inc. (2014)
…Cir. 1983). When a party seeking removal alleges fraudulent joinder, the removing party bears the substantial burden of proving the alleged fraud. See Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F. Supp. 91, 92 (E.D. Mo…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)
…fiber that began or caused the process that resulted in mesothelioma, but that asbestos fiber in general is the only known cause of the disease. Dr. Maddox also testified that mesothelioma results from an individual's…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · May 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Accident Fund Insurance Company v. Casey (2018)
…then, within 90 days, filing a motion to substitute. Rule 52.13. But "\[a\]s a general proposition, the Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure, including its pleading requirements, do not apply to workers' compensation actions, unless…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Schaffer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…cited in the Petition that creates a federal cause of action. Moreover, a case with a general maritime nature requesting common law remedies does not provide a ground for federal jurisdiction. Pierce v. Parker Towing Co.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff is entitled to one recovery in a personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · December 21, 2011 · in the opinion
Carey v. JP Bushnell Packing Supply Company (2011)
…In deciding this issue, the Court may consider the pleadings and supporting affidavits. Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F.Supp. 91, 92 (E.D.Mo.1995). Discussion Plaintiffs allege Plaintiff John Carey contracted mesothelioma as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 18, 2018 · in the opinion
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Pennington (2018)
…the purpose of adding Noranda as a party defendant. Discussion I. Personal Jurisdiction Defendant Pennington first argues that this Court has neither general nor specific jurisdiction over her. "When personal jurisdiction is challenged by a defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri · October 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Holzer v. Athene Annuity & Life Assurance Co. (2017)
…the mine. The general rule governing the personal liability of an officer or director of a corporation for torts committed by the corporation is that he is not liable where he has not participated therein, nor…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Hartfield v. 3M Company (2016)
…however, because she did not allege that the dealership had knowledge of the defect when it sold the car and state law did not impose on the dealership a general post-sale duty to warn. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…911 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff the "identity of issues" factor. 8…