No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …and Doyle, P. J., concur. \[1\] We note that this Court granted General Electric Company's motion to withdraw its appeal from Case No. A11A2025. \[2\] OCGA § 51-12-33 (d) provides as follows: (d) (1…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …CertainTeed Corporation, Selby, Battersby & Company, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Pfizer Corporation, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., General Electric Company, The Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Conwed Corporation, CBS Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille Inc…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …BACKGROUND According to the general allegations of the operative fourth amended complaint, David was then a 54-year-old male with mesothelioma who was environmentally exposed as a bystander to asbestos fibers supplied by Special Electric…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Superior Court OF State OF California (2013)

    …subd. (b).) The reason for this waiver should be obvious. As a general matter, when an individual verifies discovery responses, further discovery can be directed to that individual to determine the sources for the initial responses…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)

    …breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…

  6. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 5, 2012

    Martinez v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. (2012)

    …and Workers' Compensation; Successor Liability; Punitive Damages; Venue, Removal and Transfer; Choice of Law; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: DASRL textile plant, Berazategui, Berazategui electrician in the Nylon division DASRL textile plant, Berazategui Berazategui 1963-1980

  7. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 24, 2019

    Rowland v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Worksites: home renovation projects; Plastolite; General Motors homeowner assisting with home renovation clean-up home renovation projects 1972-1976; launderer of her husband's work clothing Plastolite; launderer of her father's work clothing General Motors

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 11, 2019

    Bagwell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …were not at fault and the trial court's evidence and instruction rulings, but raised the survival-action general damages against RMC Holdings, increasing the total award from $1,265,000 to $1,498,333.34…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 16, 2013

    Watts v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2013)

    …fault law a proven co-obligor's virile share reduces the recoverable award. Awards of general damages are not disturbed absent an abuse of the jury's great discretion. Statute of Limitations; Employer and Contractor Liability…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)

    …at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  11. Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · April 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    Riggs v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2013)

    …P.2d 629, 634 (Utah 1995) ("The general rule regarding statutes of limitations is that the limitation period begins to run [\67] when the last event necessary to complete the cause of action occurs."). In other…

  12. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · December 29, 2010 · in the opinion

    Griffin v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust (2010)

    …in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party—here, plaintiff—and draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiff's favor. Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 408, 939 P2d 608 (1997). Plaintiff worked as…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …at p. 1143.) The Supreme Court explained: "By making exceptions to Civil Code section 1714's general duty of ordinary care only when foreseeability and policy considerations justify a categorical no-duty rule, we preserve the…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …702(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, nor do they satisfy the Daubert factors, including "testability," "peer review," and "general acceptance" within the "relevant scientific community," Bresler, 855 F.3d at 195. On the contrary…

  15. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …according to Johnson, is on whether "the category of negligent conduct at issue, considering the general character of the event, is sufficiently likely to result in the kind of harm experienced, so that liability may be…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · November 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bordelon v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2017)

    …13-1. In general, courts have found plaintiffs not to be dilatory when the plaintiff amends his complaint "before any trial or pre-trial dates were scheduled and no significant activity beyond the pleading stage has…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 17, 2013 · in the opinion

    Logan v. AP Moller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)

    …warn Mr. Logan of the dangers associated with Calidria because it provided adequate warnings to GP. Plaintiffs submit that apart from special orders and test shipments which were not available to the general public, all asbestos…