No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

151 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 8

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …Owens-Corning's Distribution of Kaylo Manufactured By Owens-Illinois, Followed By Owens-Corning's Purchase of the Kaylo Division ¶ 53 In 1943, Owens-Illinois began operating the pilot plant to manufacture Kaylo. $2,849,000…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · December 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Certainteed Corporation v. Dexter (2010)

    …to allocate part of the total fault to that party. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parrish, 58 S.W.3d 467, 482 n. 5 (Ky. 2001) (citation omitted); see also Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012

    Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)

    …water treatment chemicals Pacific State Steel Fremont or Hayward 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Owens-Corning Fiberglass Santa Clara 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Chevron Richmond…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …and can be held strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The sophisticated user defense relieves a manufacturer from its usual…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …design." (Bailey v. Safeway, Inc. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 206, 214, citing Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413, 432.…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · September 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)

    …at 446. Several of the manufacturers, including Crane and OCF \[Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation\], moved for summary judgments on the ground that there was insufficient evidence linking the plaintiffs' injuries to any particular manufacturer's product…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 26, 2011 · in the opinion

    Galicinao v. McMASTER Carr Supply Company (2011)

    …the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site. \[Citation.\]" (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) Our Supreme Court in Rutherford specifically declined…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Woodard v. Crane Co. (2011)

    …design defects, and failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) In his complaint, Woodard alleged that Crane's valves were defective based on theories of defective design and…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571 N.W.2d 530, 533 (Mich…

  11. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  12. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …recovery under the statute of repose, as the products were permanent additions to real property. See Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90, 91 (Iowa 1996). Therefore, we reverse the district court…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Berry v. Anco Insulations (2019)

    …defendants," Northern Pump Co., Warren Pumps LLC, Goulds Pumps Inc., Gardner Denver Inc. and Crane Co. \[3\] Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La. App. 1 Cir. 4/2/04), 878 So.2d 631…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …a large number of Powell valves at the refinery. \[4\] See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150, at [\2] (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (unpublished) (applying Lohrmann to North Carolina…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)) ("In asbestos litigation, evidence is sufficient to establish product identity where…

  16. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …289 P.3d at 195; see Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 861 (Iowa 1994) (finding that "it is not necessary and indeed may be impossible to establish exactly how much…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …We disagree. The purpose of punitive damages is "to punish wrongdoing and deter future misconduct by either the defendant or other potential wrongdoers." (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …No. 4 does not adequately convey the concept of concurrent causation and the trial court properly declined to accept it as part of the jury instruction. See Skonberg v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 215 Ill. App…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)

    …a jury, the exposure at issue was not de minimis. See Smalls v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 843 A.2d 410 (Pa. Super. 2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa. Super. 2004…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …1104-1105 \[same\]; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 654-657 \[affirming nonsuit in favor of manufacturer because plaintiff offered insufficient evidence he encountered manufacturer's specific asbestos-containing product…