30 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
…encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…sources, jury reasonably allocated 85 percent share of comparative fault to Union Carbide where it submitted no evidence detailing plaintiff's exposure from other sources\]; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…s analysis is "inconsistent" with two non-binding authorities: Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County., 384 P.3d 284 (Cal. 2016) and Olivio v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143 (N.J. 2006). (Mot…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Turley v. Familian Corporation (2017)
…factor in causing Webb's mesothelioma. (See Rutherford, supra, 16 Cal.4th at pp. 976-977;Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 476.)" (Webb, supra, 63 Cal.4th at p. 193…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…a negligent failure to warn action." May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., 446 Md. 1, 25 n.22 (2015) (citation omitted). In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, supra, the Court noted that Professors Henderson and Twerski …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Paulus v. Crane Co. (2014)
…the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion
Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…Electric's asbestos was a substantial factor in causing Webb's mesothelioma. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)
…Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion
McCoy v. PolyVision Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2012)
…foreseeability of risk was the primary (if not only) consideration in the duty analysis."\[19\] In Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.\[20\] the New Jersey Supreme Court focused on foreseeability analysis and determined a duty existed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)
…and all of the witnesses who would provide testimony regarding the defendant's liability regarding each product. Wolter's notice of deposition in the MDL stated he would provide testimony regarding Owens-Illinois and Pabst. Nevertheless…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)
…to prove causation by establishing a reasonable medical probability that exposure to a defendant's product contributed to the plaintiff's risk of developing cancer. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…Hayes, Lipe Automation Corp., Lucas Variety Automotive Holdings Co., Mack Trucks, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Navistar, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc., Pneumo Abex Corp., Riley Power, Inc., Todd Shipyards Corp., Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…containing CalPortland product. A plaintiff claiming asbestos-related injuries must establish some exposure to the asbestos-containing product or activity for which the defendant is responsible. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · December 16, 2010
Certainteed Corporation v. Dexter (2010)
James G. Dexter, a pipefitter from 1946 to 1984, developed lung cancer and asbestosis and died during the lawsuit. He and his estate sued nineteen companies, later joined by eleven more, over asbestos-containing pipes, gaskets and insulation at many…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Noll v. American Biltrite Inc. (2017)
…personal jurisdiction over Special because Noll did not allege sufficient facts to show Special purposefully [\1029] availed itself of the privilege of doing business in Washington. WE CONCUR: Johnson, J. Owens, J. Stephens, J. Gordon McCloud…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corporation (2014)
…Ltd., 998 P.2d 405, 413 (Ca. 2000) (adopting the two-injury rule in California); Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W. 2d 627, 636 (Wis. 1999) (adopting the two-injury rule in Wisconsin)…