151 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 6 of 8
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 12, 2023 · in the opinion
Finello v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2023)
…fibers. We agree with Tragarz Court's approach and adopt it here. Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Company, 943 A.2d at 225-226. In Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)
…App. W.D. 2000). The second is where an agency relationship is established between a parent corporation and its subsidiary. See State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Bacon, 63 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Mo…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Estes v. Eaton Corporation (2020)
…authority cited by Estes, where the trial court specifically mentioned and rejected plaintiff's expert testimony as "\completely lacking in probative force.' "(See Meiner v. Ford Motor Co. (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 127, 134-135.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Orton (2021)
…underpinnings" and "correctness of the expert's conclusions" may affect any ultimate determination on the merits, but do not govern admissibility. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718-19 (7th Cir. 2000)…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)
…been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller...." Small, 329 S.C. at 466, 494 S.E.2d at 844. Fisher cites Branham v. Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203, 210, 701 S.E.2d 5…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…in brakes sold to end users. Various entities, including Bendix, Ford, and General Motors, purchased asbestos-containing friction material from Abex, [\256] but its most significant business came from Rayloc, which manufactured brake products that were…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
The court granted Ford Motor Co.'s motions for summary judgment on causation and punitive damages, dismissing the Dickens plaintiffs' claims against Ford with prejudice. Under Mississippi's frequency, regularity and proximity test with product identification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 28, 2025 · in the opinion
Beagan v. Akebono Brake Corp. (2025)
…it was required, based on interstate federalism concerns embodied in the due process clause, to divest itself of its power to render a judgment over them in this case (see Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)
625, 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (2016)); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015) ("Also referred to as \any exposure' theory, or \single fiber' theory…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)
…offer, the judgment constitutes prima facie evidence showing the offer was reasonable and the offeror is eligible for costs as specified in section 998."'" (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Hostetler v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (2020)
…An inability to prove that a particular exposure is "safe" is not the same as proof that exposure at that level has a causal connection to adverse effects. Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F. Supp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 25, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (2021)
…case that J&J has the burden of proving that the attorney-client privilege and/or work-product doctrine applies. See, e.g., Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., C.A. No. 13-06529, 2015 WL 5193568…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)
…2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)
…2) \legal cause.'" (Turley, at p. 979.) "\\[I\]f there has been no exposure, there is no causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)
…5 Ill.2d 614, 126 N.E.2d 836, 840 (1955)). "A manufacturer has a nondelegable duty to design a reasonably safe product." Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 353 Ill.Dec. 327, 955 N.E.2d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Hulin v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2021)
…testimony, fact or expert, to show that AmChem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his lung cancer. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion
Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)
…record indicates that the Union Carbide products at issue contained chrysotile fibers, but none of the attached studies specifically looked at that type of fiber. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Ltl Management LLC v. Emory (2024)
…Ford Motor Co. v. Mont Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 592 U.S. 351, 354-55 (2021). Despite this substantial connection, Ford tried to argue that although accidents involving its allegedly defective vehicles occurred in Montana and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)
…(Cf. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 525, 553 \[jury's award of 13 times the amount counsel for plaintiffs requested in noneconomic damages and three times the amount requested for…