24 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
… Design Defect; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Choice of Law Worksites: General Electric Large Steam Turbine Division; Deforest Company; home renovations with his father; General Plumbing job sites laborer, plumber, and shade tree mechanic Deforest Company…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 13, 2021
Gilstrap v. CBS Corporation (2021)
…Robert E. Lee 1959-1964; trainee/trainer Nuclear Power School Idaho Falls 1964-1967; master chief, engine room supervisor / Chief of the Boat General Dynamics/Electric Boat shipyard (USS Omaha and USS Indianapolis) Groton 1975-1980
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 16, 2022 · in the opinion
Thorne v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2022)
…Id. at 611. The plaintiff removed the thermal insulation blankets for overhauling the turbine as part of general maintenance. Id. The plaintiff alleged he breathed asbestos dust after the blankets were removed and while cleaning the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…Wrongful Death, and Loss of Consortium claims under General Maritime Law The Vessel Defendants argue that no federal court recognize a cause of action for "take-home" asbestos exposure under the Jones Act or maritime law. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021
Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
The magistrate judge recommended granting General Dynamics' motion for summary judgment against the Carnes plaintiffs because they produced no evidence that Mr. Carnes was exposed to an asbestos-containing product attributable to General Dynamics. Under Texas…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
Pruitt perform general maintenance on these pumps every one to two months, which required removing and replacing gaskets and packing material. (Id.) Mr. Dumas further testified that Mr. Pruitt's maintenance work took two to three…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…rationale for why it should can be gleamed from the California law cited by the plaintiff. California follows the general rule of no duty to warn, but recognizes exceptions to that doctrine.\[13\] In Sherman v…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · March 20, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Reinz Wisconsin Gasket, LLC (2023)
…The parties should also submit a proposed appointment order. The Court will select a receiver from the parties' list and enter an order appointing the receiver. "As a general rule, costs and expenses of a receivership…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2021)
…or the vote accepting the Plan).\[65\] Rather, he relies on a one page general "Attorney Agreement" which provides that Mr. Bevan can vote on behalf of his client in a bankruptcy case filed by any…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Vocciante v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Id. at ¶ 28) Accordingly, plaintiffs assert claims for strict liability, negligence, false representation, violation of the Jones Act, violation of general maritime law, loss of consortium, wrongful death, and seek, inter alia, punitive damages. (Id. at…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · May 19, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…l\]ike a number of other jurisdictions, Ohio follows the general rule that a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn of adjacent parts supplied by a third party, the so-called bare metal defense…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · August 27, 2020 · in the opinion
In re Energy Future Holdings Corp. (2020)
…to a bankruptcy case to identify with reasonable promptness the identity of those making claims against the bankruptcy estate, and the general amount of the claims, a necessary step in achieving the goal of successful reorganization…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion
In re Energy Future Holdings Corp. (2020)
…govern the question of whether the bar date should apply to latent claimants—instead, the Bankruptcy Court relied on general principles of due process. And the bar date dispute was not anterior to and separate from…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Shaw v. American Friction (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…is the proper standard under Delaware law, and the General Scheduling Order expressly requires a "showing of good cause" to modify the scheduling order.\[28\] To assess good cause, as the Special Master and Superior Court…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 22, 2022 · in the opinion
In re Paddock Enterprises, LLC (2022)
…the clerk's office, collecting ballots in its stead. Having given some though to this reasoning, I believe this premise is incorrect as a general matter, but it certainly is in this case. As is typical…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pearsons v. Heidelberg USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…on the mouthpiece. This process also caused him to breathe in asbestos dust.\[2\] Mr. Pearsons also performed general maintenance on the Linotype and cleaned the room where the machine was located. Mr. Pearsons swept dust…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Roadarmel v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…at 322. The Defendant does not identify which counts of the complaint should arguably be dismissed and refers only to general descriptions of them as "ancillary" or "incidental." (D.I. 26 at 14) In arguing for…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 14, 2022 · in the opinion
McLaughlin v. C&d Contractors (2022)
…interpret the Act liberally to effectuate its remedial objective.\[35\] This liberal interpretation recognizes that the General Assembly passed the Act for the express purpose of benefitting the worker and requires the Court to resolve any…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2020 · in the opinion
Petit v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…testimony of Craig Mountz, AMMCO's corporate representative. The New York Times article highlights the use of asbestos in the industry in general, but does not aid Plaintiff in satisfying the Sweredoski standard. The Mountz testimony…