4 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 17, 2020 · in the opinion
Bedford v. American Honda Motor Company (2020)
…and proximity" of asbestos exposure in order to determine if a plaintiff has established a prima facie causal connection in asbestos-related tort litigation. See Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So.3d 66, 70 (Miss…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion
Simpson v. American International Industries (2023)
…871 (5th Cir. 1991) (citing Tri-Cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Printing Pressmen & Assts.' Local 349, Int'l Printing Pressman & Assts.' Union of N. Am., 427 F.2d 325, 327 (5th Cir. 1970)). "To that…