No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

23 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    Charlevoix performed clutch and gasket work on Ford vehicles owned by family and friends. (D.I. 216, Ex. 3 at 152:16-19) However, Mr. Milligan could not recall the manufacturer of any clutches or gaskets…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…

  3. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hostetter v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …and documents show that for nearly the entire decade of the 1970s, Hostetter worked as a mechanic on trucks manufactured by Mack Trucks, Inc. (Mack) and Ford Motor Company (Ford). Hostetter Dep. at 98-99, 371…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2016)

    The rules of evidence do not permit an expert to testify that "\[j\]ust because we cannot rule anything out" that "we can rule everything in." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 08-630, 2013 WL…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …distribution is that " \[t\]hey are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products." Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 61 Cal.2d 256…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …plaintiff's exposure. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 2016 WL 6876490, at [\8] (Pa. Nov. 22, 2016) (permitting expert opinion that "Rost's exposures to asbestos at Smith Motors were sufficiently frequent, regular, and proximate…

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). As is the case with regard to the Federal Rules of…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …b)(2); Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 189 F.3d 971, 981 n.18 (9th Cir. 1999). A Rule 12(c) motion challenges the sufficiency of the opposing party's pleadings, and the court…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …suitable place for the action, the court must consider a variety of factors, including whether the defendants are amenable to personal jurisdiction in the alternative forum. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court, 141 S…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Defendants, represented by Kelly A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. Siemens Industry, Inc., successor in interest to Siemens…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 3, 2024 · in the opinion

    Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …to establish that any specific dosages of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 11, 2021

    Hayes v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …and his children joined the suit. One defendant, SYSTRA Engineering, was the corporate successor through name changes to Ford, Bacon & Davis, which had done construction and maintenance at the fertilizer plant. SYSTRA argued Louisiana courts lacked…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Mine Safety Appliances Company, Cross Defendant, represented by…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mosher v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Defendants, represented by Kelly A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. Siemens Industry, Inc., successor in interest to Siemens…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Corporation, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. The Fairbanks Company, Defendant, represented by Timothy A. Sullivan, III, Wilbraham, Lawler…