10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 24, 2000 · in the opinion
Vasura v. Acands (2000)
…448, 451 (9th Cir.1994). Others have held that the relevant time period for ascertaining foreign state status is that in which the conduct at issue took place. See General Electric Capital Corp. v. Grossman, 991…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 17, 2015 · in the opinion
McCloskey v. Cemline Corporation (2015)
…DECEASED, AND PATRICIA PARTNER, IN HER OWN RIGHT, Appellants, v. CEMLINE CORPORATION, CERRO WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC., THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, MADDEN BOILER WORKS, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG AUTO GLASS…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979 · in the opinion
Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)
…defective product. See Urie v. Thompson, 337 U.S. 163, 69 S.Ct. 1018, 11 A.L.R.2d 252; Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Barker, 228 F.2d 842; Brush Beryllium Co. v. Meckley, 284…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 11, 2011
Farrall v. Atlas Turner (In re Asbestos Litigation Limited TO Farrall, 2011)
…holding the 1982 release barred James Farrall's new mesothelioma claims; the plaintiffs lost. A clear and unambiguous general release covering known and unknown, unmanifested injuries from asbestos exposure bars a later suit for a long…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…that "\[t\]he Trustees shall consult with the TAC and the Future Claimants' Representative (i) on the general implementation and administration of the Asbestos PI Trust; (ii) on the general implementation and administration of the TDP…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…they function together. This finding is supported by evidence of record, including testimony cited by Mt. McKinley which established that Corning's General Counsel and Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Vincent P. Hatton, could not specify…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
…at 982 F.2d 721 (2d Cir.1992), and the publication of numerous stories in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal — any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns Manville, c.f.…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001 · in the opinion
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
…[\1036] Moreover, section 2 was enacted to extend the general limitations period in express recognition of the long latency period associated with asbestos-related diseases and illnesses. Extending the limitations period only for the very few…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)
…year discovery based statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims. The comprehensiveness of the medical malpractice act is evidence of the legislature's intent that it should prevail over the more general wrongful death statute…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…103:10-13 (Diggs). 68. Typically, the asbestos claims against PPG contained general products liability allegations, or allegations that might be interpreted in such a manner, asserted against all defendants, along with specific allegations about PPG…