No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …are A.W. Chesterton Company; Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; Bayer CropScience, Inc.; Borg Warner Morse TEC, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Chattanooga, Inc.; CBS Corporation; CertainTeed Corporation; Crane Company; Ford Motor Company; Foster…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    Davidson v. Georgia Pacific LLC (2014)

    …for the District of Utah, in two recent cases, Anderson v. Ford Motor Company, 950 F. Supp.2d 1217 (D. Utah 2013) and Smith v. Ford Motor Company, No. 2:08-630, 2013 WL 214378 (D…

  3. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015

    Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)

    …four areas of Tennessee law: modified comparative fault, a $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages, allocating fault to nonparties (including bankrupt companies), and the innocent retailer statute. The plaintiffs agreed Tennessee law applied but said it…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 28, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …v. A-C Prods. Liab. Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492-93 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378, at [\1]-3 (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2014)…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Laverty v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010)

    …BUDD COMPANY, CATERPILLAR, INC., CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION, CONTINENTAL TEVES, INC., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXO SUPPLY COMPANY, FORD CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 10, 2011 · in the opinion

    Breedlove v. CSX Transportation (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …permitted, over objection by a defendant, in at least one other MDL case before this Court. See Kirkland v. Ford Motor Co., 09-74077: Doc. 65 \[December 1, 2010 Order of the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …Grilli Marcus, Whiteford [\810] Taylor and Preston LLP, R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr., Patrick C. Smith, Dehay and Elliston LLP, F. Ford Loker, Jr., Joshua Franklin Kahn, Leianne S. McEvoy, Michael L. Haslup, Matthew R. Schroll, Robin…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …thirteenth juror. See Meals ex rel. Meals v. Ford Motor Co., 417 S.W.3d 414, 420 (Tenn.2013) ("No verdict is valid unless approved by the trial judge acting as the thirteenth juror."). When a…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Flomenhoft v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2013)

    …summary judgment in favor of the defendants on a loss of consortium claim in an asbestos matter with nearly identical facts to the instant case. See Stevens v. Ford Motor Corp., 107 So. 3d 416 (Fla…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 24, 2017 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2017)

    …Rubber Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Theodore F. Roberts, Venable LLP, Scott Mason Richmond, Venable LLP & M. Elizabeth O'Neill, Hawkins Parnell Thackston and Young LLP. Georgia-Pacific, LLC, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by F. Ford Loker…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Crowe v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2019)

    …LHWCA. In P.C. Pfeiffer, the Court determined that Ford, an employee who fastened military vehicles to flat railroad cars for further inland transportation after the vehicles had been unloaded from ships, was engaged in maritime…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2017)

    …The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Theodore F. Roberts, Venable LLP & M. Elizabeth O'Neill, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE LLP, pro hac vice. Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Cross Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …103 Harv. L. Rev. 1989, 1989-97 (1990)). Maryland follows the separate disease rule in toxic exposure cases. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Ford, 204 Md. App. 1, 268 (2012) (Eyler, D., J., concurring in part…