No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

40 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 27, 2009

    Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (2009)

    The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for General Motors, Cincinnati Gas & Electric and General Electric, and the executor of Dennis Martin's estate lost on all claims. Under Kentucky law, a negligence claim needs evidence that…

  2. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 15, 2014

    Estate OF Gregovich v. Auer Steel & Heating Supply (2014)

    George Gregovich alleged that asbestos from products made or supplied by sixteen defendants caused his mesothelioma. He died about eighteen months after filing suit, and his estate and a guardian of his person and estate continued the case. The…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 10, 2019

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    Sherri Deem sued on her own behalf and for the estate of her husband, Thomas Deem, who worked at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1974 to 1981 as an apprentice and journeyman outside machinist. The complaint alleged he was exposed to…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …230, 67 S.Ct. 1146, 91 L.Ed. 1447.) Accordingly, "\[p\]reemption fundamentally is a question of congressional intent." (English v. General Electric Co. (1990) 496 U.S. 72, 78-79, 110 S.Ct. 2270, 110…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)

    …responsible for taking asbestos fiber from bags and mixing it in five gallon buckets with a substance called Glyptal, which was made by General Electric. He then applied the mixture to the generator's spark plugs. {…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; FXY, Inc.; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Garlock, Inc.; General Electric Co.; General Gasket Corp.; General Refractories Co.; Genuine Parts Co.; Georgia-Pacific, LLC; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Gorman-Rupp Co.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Gibson Homans Co.; Garlock, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Glidden Co.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Gould Pumps; Griffin Wheel Co.; Hanson Pipe & Products Minnesota…

  8. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)

    …125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993),\[2\] and its progeny, Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 470 Mich. 749, 685 N.W.2d 391 (2004), General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 25, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smith v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2015)

    …yard brought claims against General Electric ("GE") after PCB-contaminated oil leaked out of discarded GE electrical components onto their land. The court held that "the dismantling and processing of junk electrical components was not a…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …Pump Division, FMC CORPORATION, sued as successor of Northern Pumps and Peerless Pumps, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY a/k/a NAPA, sued individually and d/b/a Rayloc Brakes, GRINNELL, LLC…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008

    Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …remained on causation, and granted Ford's and GM's unopposed motions, so Mrs. Kummer's claims against Viacom go forward. Under general maritime law, using the Pennsylvania-based "regularity, frequency and proximity" test, direct evidence…

  12. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    …deprived the trial judge of the opportunity to deal with the problem when it arose. Such inaction is deemed a waiver of any resulting error for appellate purposes. (Emphasis added.); Delaware Electric Coop., Inc. v. Duphily…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)

    …successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2015 · in the opinion

    Assenzio v. Burnham (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …Nutmeg Technologies, Inc., 43 AD3d 599, 602 \[3rd Dept 2007\]). The link between asbestos and disease, general causation, is well documented. In re New York Asbestos Litigation (Marshall), 28 AD3d 255 (1st Dept. 2006). The First…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 14, 2015 · in the opinion

    Ricci v. Cleaver-Brooks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …mechanical engineer (Tr at 138). He testified that while working at Joseph Loring, the company was busy designing and developing systems, electrical, sprinklers, plumbing and air conditioning for hospitals, schools and other facilities in New York…

  16. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 20, 2002

    General Motors Corp. v. Kilgore (2002)

    The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the trial court's denial of summary judgment and rendered judgment for General Motors, holding the Kilgores' claims preempted by the Federal Locomotive Inspection Act; two justices dissented. The Federal Locomotive…

  17. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    The Delaware Supreme Court remanded to the motion judge to reconsider the admissibility of the plaintiffs' general causation experts (Drs. Dodson and Lemen) because his factual findings misstated the record, leaving GM and Ford's challenge…

  18. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009

    Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)

    …despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…

  19. Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002

    Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)

    The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 25, 2016

    Dennis v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2016)

    The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of General Motors' motion for summary judgment, so the widow Fayrene Dennis kept her jury verdict allowing her to participate in the workers' compensation fund. Asbestos…