11 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion
Bowser v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
…regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked."\[23\] At least one federal circuit decision, Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., applied Lohrmann's so-called "frequency, regularity…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Mannahan v. Eaton Corporation (2016)
…similar products at the same time periods and worksites. Not uncommonly, plaintiffs have been unable to prove direct exposure to a given defendant's product." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1218 (Cal…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 28, 2005
Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2005)
…from contact with it is a covered occupational disease and workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy. Expert Testimony; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Wrongful Death and Survival former employee of Libbey-Owens-Ford Company
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)
…s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Punitive Damages, Plaintiffs stated that Lockheed had asserted the improper standard for punitive damages in a case such as this one, and then they cited to Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion
Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)
…both that he was actually exposed to asbestos-containing materials that were installed by the \[defendants\] and that such exposure was a substantial contributing factor in causing his injuries"); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…A. Governing Law In asbestos-related latent injury cases, the plaintiff "must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 982 (1997…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)
…no evidence that Kleinberg was ever exposed to asbestos or that he brought asbestos home on his clothing. Without evidence of exposure there is no causation. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…