8 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…1950s-1980s; helper in boiler and furnace removal and installation stepfather's boiler and furnace business 1950s; worker at a construction products company 1970s; handyman 1970s and 1980s; union carpenter various construction sites 1960s to 1980s
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 8, 2010
Horn v. A.W. Chesterson Co. (In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2010)
Ten asbestos cases, brought by plaintiffs represented by the same law firm, were assigned to one New York County judge for trial. Eight of the plaintiffs, alleging mesothelioma, asked the court to consolidate their cases into three groups for joint…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)
…STEWART R. SINGER. NAVCOM DEFENSE ELECTRONICS, Cross Claimant, represented by MICHAEL J. BLOCK, WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Cross Claimant, represented by CATHERINE N. JASONS, KELLEY JASONS MCGUIRE SPINELLI HANNA LLP. BAE SYSTEMS, INC., Cross…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…America; Trail King Industries; Trailstar Manufacturing Corp.; Transitional Holdings Inc.; Tube City IMS; Twin Disc Inc.; Union Carbine Corp.; Utility Trailer Manufacturing Co; Wabash Nat'l Corp.; Wells Cargo Inc.; and Yamaha Motor Corp. USA. See…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Whelan v. Armstrong Int'l (2016)
…warn. III. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 224 N.J. 189…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2018)
…warn. III. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 224 N.J. 189…