No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    Three asbestos workers, James Froud, John Friday and Wyatt Williamson, died after allegedly developing disease from prolonged exposure to asbestos products made and sold by the defendants. Froud and Friday had peritoneal mesothelioma; Williamson had…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota · March 28, 1990

    Puppe By Puppe v. AC and S., Inc. (1990)

    Vernon Puppe died of mesothelioma in 1984. His wife and two daughters sued a number of asbestos-related companies in a wrongful death action, which was removed to federal court in North Dakota. They claimed he was exposed in 1959 as an insulation…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986

    Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …Damages; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Gilbert Plastering Company, Knoxville; Union Carbide plasterer Gilbert Plastering Company Knoxville 1947-mid-1960s; utility mechanic Union Carbide mid-1960s-1967

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    …at 1061. The court granted the suppliers summary judgment based on the sophisticated user/bulk supplier defense on the basis of its findings that: Eastman and Union Carbide supplied in bulk, via railroad tank cars and…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 3, 1986 · in the opinion

    Seckular v. Celotex (1986)

    …v. Metal & Thermit Corp., 73 N.J. Super. 56, 66 (App.Div. 1962) (dismissal denied when suit in advanced stage); see also Union Carbide Corp. v. Litton Prec. Prods. Inc., 94 N.J. Super. 315 (Ch…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    Three asbestos manufacturers, Armstrong World Industries, Fibreboard and GAF, sued their liability insurers in coordinated declaratory relief actions over who must cover tens of thousands of asbestos injury suits and property damage suits over…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 27, 1988

    Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1988)

    …of Repose; Design Defect; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) plant, Cicero; Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC), Cicero employee at UARC Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) Cicero 1951-1952

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 19, 1994

    Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1994)

    … Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Loss of Consortium; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Union Electric — Labadie plant; Union Electric — Meramec plant; Washington University Research Center; Labadie Power House; Meramec Power House electrician Labadie Power House 1969…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 1, 2000

    Burgess v. Abex Corp. EX rel. Pneumo Abex (2000)

    …of an agreement to suppress or misrepresent asbestos hazards. Such evidence existed against Abex but not against Pittsburgh Corning. Expert Testimony; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco plant, Bloomington…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 17, 1999

    Burgess v. Abex Corp. (1999)

    …the jury verdict and judgment for plaintiffs (the Burgess estate and Francis Burgess) against Abex Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning Corporation on a civil conspiracy theory. A defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiracy to…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998

    Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)

    …verdicts, jury instructions about Bethlehem Steel, Hopeman and Foster Wheeler, and evidence that unions knew of asbestos hazards. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It found no abuse of discretion or prejudice in jury selection, held…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …it dissolves as it hits your lungs. That was the question you get all the time. Q. Where would you have this discussion, in your Union Hall? A. On the jobs, just among the men. Q…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …York at which Dr. Selikoff spoke.\[17\] At that conference, also attended by representatives of the Union, Zeller first learned of the health hazards to installers of asbestos in other forms as well. Liddell attended the…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)

    …s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …with Panacon Corporation, which was successor by merger of Briggs Manufacturing Company and Philip Carey Corporation; Unarco Industries, Inc., formerly known as Union Asbestos and Rubber Company; H. K. Porter Company, Thermoid Division, a Delaware Corporation…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    …There is no evidence in the record that any physician ever identified the "something" as pleural thickening nor did any physician link the "something" to asbestos exposure. Kraciun received a letter from his union after retirement…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion

    Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)

    …industry. His testimony on the state of the art has the same relevance in every asbestos case, regardless of which corporations are the defendants. In view of the commonality of the state of the art issue…

  18. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)

    …11.) A "change in that construction by this court would amount to amending the statute," and this court has acknowledged that "\[t\]he power to accomplish this does not lie in the courts." Union Electric Co…

  19. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    …LTD., FORMERLY CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD., JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, UNARCO INDUSTRIES, FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER COMPANY; EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., AND OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND JOHN DOE CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)

    …Aber, when calling on the Texas State Board of Health in April 1942. In a written report to Eagle, circulated to at least three persons in that corporation, the sales representative, referring to the article, said…