26 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 30, 2014
Barnes v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (2014)
The district court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against GE with prejudice, because plaintiffs offered no admissible evidence that Barnes was exposed to an asbestos product made or supplied…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2010
Miranda v. Abex Corp. (2010)
Four plaintiffs, Ernesto Miranda, Antonio DiBenedetto, Lutz Sommer and Gordon Cheney, sued Abex Corporation and other companies in New York County. They alleged they had mesothelioma from asbestos exposure, and two of the four had died. Miranda and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015
Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)
The court granted summary judgment to Crown Cork & Seal, CBS, General Electric, Gardner Denver, Link-Belt and Riley Power, and denied it to Crane Co. and John Crane, Inc. on the maritime claims, so the Heddens…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming · April 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust (2014)
"Under general conflict of laws principles, where the laws of the two jurisdictions would produce the same result on the particular issue presented, there is a \false conflict,' and the \[c\]ourt should avoid the choice…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 27, 2017
McCarthy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
The Superior Court denied the motions for summary judgment of Warren Pumps, Gardner Denver and General Electric, ruling that the decedent's pre-suit sworn statement was admissible and that plaintiff showed enough product identification to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 26, 2021
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
Carl Gay developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in June 2019, and died in April 2020. His daughter, Allisa Gay, as executor of his estate, sued Gardner Denver and other manufacturers and distributors. She alleged he was exposed to asbestos in Gardner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming · April 7, 2014
Johnson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. Prod. Liab. Trust (2014)
The district court granted summary judgment to Gardner Denver, Bechtel, FMC, CBS (Westinghouse's successor) and General Electric, ruling against the estate of H. Paul Johnson, because no evidence tied any of their asbestos to him…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · October 14, 2010
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Pittman (2010)
Lonnie Pittman was named as a plaintiff in a December 2002 asbestos suit against many companies. Defendants later learned he had died in March 2001, almost two years before the suit was filed. His widow, Mary Pittman, was substituted as plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
Darlene Data sued many companies in her own right and as executrix of her husband Michael Data's estate. Mr. Data served in the Navy aboard the USS Newport News from 1969 to 1973. He later worked at Mesta Machine and then at the West Pittsburgh…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Esposito v. Abb, Inc. (2021)
…INC., FMC CORPORATION, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GEROSA, INCORPORATED, GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC., GOULDS PUMPS, LLC, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC., GRINNELL LLC, ITT LLC, INDIVIDUALLY, DOING BUSINESS AS AND SUCCESSOR TO ITT…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP & Trevor J. Mohr, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Viacom Inc., Foster-Wheeler Energy Corporation & General Electric Company, Defendants, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP & Erin P…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Hockler v. William Powell Company (2015)
…631 \[WD Pa 1987\], the court also cited section 402A in holding that "the dismantling and processing of junk electrical components was not a reasonably foreseeable use of \[General Electric Company's\] product" (id. at 635)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)
…difficult if not impossible, is irrelevant to the determination whether the forum is suitable unless \the alternative forum provides no remedy at all.' \[Citations.\]" (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…or in plans, without more, is speculation and does not suffice. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat, Groton wife of a pipefitter; laundered his work clothes Electric Boat Groton 1957-1970
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2015
Walton v. OneBeacon Ins. Co. (2015)
…was awarded $163,589.37 in appellate costs. OneBeacon Insurance Company, successor to Powell's insurer General Accident, had paid roughly $655,885 in Powell's defense costs. It intervened and asked to receive the costs…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
There the canon avoids not contradiction but the superfluity of a specific provision that is swallowed by the general one, "violat\[ing\] the cardinal rule that, if possible, effect shall be given to every clause and…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…infrequent." Even when taken together with the plaintiffs' evidence of Mr. Logan's general job duties and the large number of Powell valves on site, this is insufficient to draw an inference of exposure from Powell…