No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming · April 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. Prod. Liab. Trust (2014)

    …Keahey, Jr., Lawrence Holcomb, Law Offices of G. Patterson Keahey, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Owens-Illinois Inc., pro se. Walter S. Jenkins, Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson LLC, Philadelphia, PA, Christopher Conley, Evert & Weathersby, LLC, Atlanta…

  2. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · October 14, 2010 · in the opinion

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Pittman (2010)

    … 36. Negligence or products-liability causes of action that involve latent diseases, such as asbestosis, are subject to the three-year statute of limitations under Section 15-1-49. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards, 573 So…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Barnes v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (2014)

    …Goulds Pump Inc., Ingersoll Rand Company Limited, and Owens Illinois Incorporated alleging that he continually worked with, used, handled and was caused to come in contact with Defendants' asbestos-containing products and the asbestos dust and…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner v. Alfa Laval…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …the Fourth Circuit's frequency, regularity and proximity test. It found the evidence speculative and weaker than in Jones v. Owens-Corning. It declined to adopt a relaxed test for mesothelioma and granted Powell summary judgment.

  6. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  11. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…