No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

87 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 24, 2000

    Carroll v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …s lung cancer claim was not time-barred, which favors the plaintiff over the asbestos defendants (Owens-Corning and others). Asbestosis and lung cancer are separate and distinct diseases, so a cause of action for lung…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 9, 2001

    Boldini v. Owens Corning (2001)

    …judgment for Sprinkmann Sons Corporation of Illinois and remanded, holding the construction statute of repose did not bar plaintiffs' claims based on Sprinkmann's sale and distribution of asbestos products. The Illinois construction statute of repose…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 13, 1995

    Higgins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded for a new trial in favor of plaintiff Higgins, and dismissed Owens-Corning's cross appeal on the medical monitoring award as moot. A…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Evelyn Ruckstuhl and her husband Richard sued several companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged she was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 1996 from asbestos exposure in two ways: dust on her husband's work clothes from the Baton Rouge…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 1, 2000

    Burgess v. Abex Corp. EX rel. Pneumo Abex (2000)

    On remand from the Illinois Supreme Court in light of McClure, the appellate court reversed the judgment against Abex and remanded for a new trial, and reversed the judgment against Pittsburgh Corning and ordered judgment entered…

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 6, 1996

    Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Virgil Viereck's estate and his wife Julia Viereck against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that pre-WPLA law applied and that the evidentiary rulings…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 30, 1990

    Leng v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …liability counts against Celotex and the other defendants, refusing to adopt market share liability in Illinois asbestos cases. Illinois does not recognize market share liability in asbestos cases, so a plaintiff who cannot identify the manufacturers…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …judgment for plaintiff Sarah Kirk against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on damages and liability, because the district court refused to strike two biased jurors for cause, impairing Owens-Corning's peremptory challenges…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …dismissal of the punitive damages counts and remanded, ruling for the plaintiff administrators and against the asbestos defendants including Celotex. Under the Illinois Supreme Court's National Bank decision, the Survival Act neither authorizes nor prohibits…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 2, 1990

    White v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    Dorothy White, widow of Edward White, and their son Douglas sued Celotex and many other asbestos product makers and sellers in Arizona state court over Edward's death. The defendants removed the case to federal court. According to the family's…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993

    Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)

    The Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for all defendants (Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Keene, Anchor, Chesterton, Garlock, John Crane, Rexnord and Georgia Talc) against the ten Mohawk tire plant workers, because the workers lacked sufficient…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the punitive damages awards for the Knuckles estate against Eagle-Picher and Owens-Illinois and affirmed all other judgments for the plaintiffs against the manufacturer and installer defendants. A jury…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)

    …and it ordered a new trial on punitive damages against Owens-Illinois and Eagle-Picher. A nonmanufacturing supplier-installer of asbestos is held to a 'should have known' standard in a negligent failure-to-warn claim…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 26, 1999

    Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc. (1999)

    …so judgment for the Greenleafs against Garlock and Owens Corning must be entered at the state amount. It also ordered a new trial on Garlock's and Owens Corning's crossclaims against the non-appearing defendants…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988

    Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …award, but modified the judgment to raise Raymark's share from 9.09% to 27.27% of damages because Raymark failed to prove fault by settling defendants Owens-Illinois and Armstrong. Under Texas comparative causation (Duncan)…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985

    Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)

    …and remanded for a new trial against Celotex, Fibreboard, Owens-Illinois and Pittsburgh Corning, but reversed the judgment against Raymark and dismissed it from the case. Under Texas law, a plaintiff without a medically probable cancer…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 1, 1993

    Watkins v. Fibreboard Corp. (1993)

    Four workers, George Watkins, Lloyd Brannen, Isaac Price Jr. and Harold Barron, sued several asbestos companies in federal court in Texas after years of exposure to asbestos-containing products. At trial, the jury found the defendants' products…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …against Porter Hayden. It also reversed all punitive damages awards for insufficient evidence and dismissed Owens-Illinois's appeal. A bystander shows substantial-factor causation for a defendant's asbestos product through the frequency, regularity and…