No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

20 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 22, 1987

    In re Asbestos Litigation (1987)

    …which was a loss for the manufacturers (Raymark, Owens-Illinois, GM and others) and a win for the plaintiffs. Common law decisions of a state's highest court are subject to equal protection review under the…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …McKesson Corp.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Midco International, Inc.; Motion Control Industries, Inc.; Nibco, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Paccar, Inc.; Peterbilt Motors Co.; Philips Electronics North America Corp.; Pneumo Abex Corp.; Quaker Oats Co.; Rheem Manufacturing…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Monsanto Chemical Co.; Motion Control Industries, Inc.; Murco Wall Products, Inc.; New York Air Brake Corp.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pecora Corp.; Plastics Engineering Co.; Pneumo Abex Corp. as successor-in-interest to Abex Corp.; Railroad Friction…

  4. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)

    …LEMBERGER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS, LLC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, OWENS ILLINOIS, INC., WAHL REFRACTORIES, INC., PRICE VIKING, HENNES SERVICES, INC., ZIEN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sherman v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2015)

    …and a reasonable medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a substantial factor in bringing about the risk of the alleged injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Greenberg v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2015)

    …and a reasonable medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a substantial factor in bringing about the risk of the alleged injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (2009)

    …from several other states that find manufacturers and employers liable for asbestos-related illnesses from asbestos dust brought home from work. The best cases for Plaintiff are Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143…

  8. Court case · North Dakota Supreme Court · December 22, 1999 · in the opinion

    Black v. Abex Corp. (1999)

    …Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp., 643 F.Supp. 1454, 1457 (W.D.Pa.1986); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203, 1216-21 (1997); Goldman…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …To be considered a proximate cause of an injury, the acts of the defendant must have been a \substantial factor' in contributing to the injury. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 969…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …context of products liability actions, the plaintiff must prove that the defective products supplied by the defendant were a substantial factor in bringing about his or her injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002 · in the opinion

    Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)

    …its discretion. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corporation v. Powell, supra. Reversible Error, Directed Verdict, and Illinois Law Having found error, we must next determine if the error is reversible. TEX. R.APP.P. 44.1. An error…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …has been adopted by a majority of federal jurisdictions and many state courts, Robertson; Jones v. Ownes-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712 (4th Cir.1995)(applying North Carolina law); Slaughter v. Southern Talc Co.…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2012 · in the opinion

    Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …defects: Manufacturing defects, design defects, and "\warning defects,' i.e., inadequate warnings or failures to warn."\[4\] (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …disease." Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning, 843 A.2d 410, 414 (Pa.Super.2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1038-39 (Pa.Super.2004); Lonasco v. A-Best Products Co., 757 A…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…

  17. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007 · in the opinion

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    …a resident of South Carolina, the trial court focused on whether the cause of action arose in South Carolina, relying on Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 346 S.C. 37, 550 S.E.2d 589…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Vanhooser v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2012)

    …difficult to determine when the injury occurs and "\[n\]o temporally discrete event exists that encompasses the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1977) 16 Cal.4th 520…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …strictly liable for failure to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers' products — the court began with the general rule formulated in its decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006

    Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)

    …his employer knew of asbestos dangers. The Wellman rule, under which a premises owner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees doing inherently dangerous work, applies only if the contractor or its employee knew…