No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

95 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    …Edwards, holding his asbestosis claim was not time barred, and rejected the defendants (Owens-Illinois and others) on the limitations defense. In negligence or products liability actions involving latent disease, a cause of action under Miss…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994

    Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Owens Illinois, Owens Corning and Fibreboard and third-party defendant Flintkote, and denied the Perrins' request to shift the burden of proof on causation. Under Iowa law, evidence…

  3. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 24, 2000

    Carroll v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …s lung cancer claim was not time-barred, which favors the plaintiff over the asbestos defendants (Owens-Corning and others). Asbestosis and lung cancer are separate and distinct diseases, so a cause of action for lung…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 9, 2001

    Boldini v. Owens Corning (2001)

    …judgment for Sprinkmann Sons Corporation of Illinois and remanded, holding the construction statute of repose did not bar plaintiffs' claims based on Sprinkmann's sale and distribution of asbestos products. The Illinois construction statute of repose…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    Ten insulation workers or their survivors sued makers of asbestos insulation in federal court in Wisconsin. Two of the workers died of mesothelioma, and the other eight have asbestosis. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Evelyn Ruckstuhl and her husband Richard sued several companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged she was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 1996 from asbestos exposure in two ways: dust on her husband's work clothes from the Baton Rouge…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 1, 2000

    Burgess v. Abex Corp. EX rel. Pneumo Abex (2000)

    On remand from the Illinois Supreme Court in light of McClure, the appellate court reversed the judgment against Abex and remanded for a new trial, and reversed the judgment against Pittsburgh Corning and ordered judgment entered…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 6, 1996

    Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Virgil Viereck's estate and his wife Julia Viereck against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that pre-WPLA law applied and that the evidentiary rulings…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 30, 1990

    Leng v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …liability counts against Celotex and the other defendants, refusing to adopt market share liability in Illinois asbestos cases. Illinois does not recognize market share liability in asbestos cases, so a plaintiff who cannot identify the manufacturers…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 8, 1991

    Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1991)

    The Second Circuit reversed the judgment for the plaintiff against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, because the revival statute's exception applied. Under New York's 1986…

  12. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1989

    Board of Education v. A, C & S, Inc. (1989)

    Thirty-four Illinois school districts, including the Chicago Board of Education, sued 78 asbestos makers, distributors and installers. They sought the cost of inspecting, repairing and removing asbestos-containing materials in their buildings, which the Asbestos…

  13. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · October 14, 1987

    Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1987)

    The executrix of Roy Goldman's estate sued Johns-Manville and many other asbestos companies over Goldman's death. Goldman had worked at the Sherlock Bakery in Toledo, Ohio. The plaintiff could not identify which products at the bakery contained…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …dismissal of the punitive damages counts and remanded, ruling for the plaintiff administrators and against the asbestos defendants including Celotex. Under the Illinois Supreme Court's National Bank decision, the Survival Act neither authorizes nor prohibits…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 2, 1990

    White v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    Dorothy White, widow of Edward White, and their son Douglas sued Celotex and many other asbestos product makers and sellers in Arizona state court over Edward's death. The defendants removed the case to federal court. According to the family's…

  16. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · April 30, 1993

    Hogland v. Celotex Corp. (1993)

    Jessie Hogland sued several companies, some initially under fictitious names, claiming he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos-containing products. He died of the disease on November 10, 1985. In 1990 his wife, Yvonne Hogland, as…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the punitive damages awards for the Knuckles estate against Eagle-Picher and Owens-Illinois and affirmed all other judgments for the plaintiffs against the manufacturer and installer defendants. A jury…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)

    …and it ordered a new trial on punitive damages against Owens-Illinois and Eagle-Picher. A nonmanufacturing supplier-installer of asbestos is held to a 'should have known' standard in a negligent failure-to-warn claim…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988

    Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …award, but modified the judgment to raise Raymark's share from 9.09% to 27.27% of damages because Raymark failed to prove fault by settling defendants Owens-Illinois and Armstrong. Under Texas comparative causation (Duncan)…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985

    Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)

    …and remanded for a new trial against Celotex, Fibreboard, Owens-Illinois and Pittsburgh Corning, but reversed the judgment against Raymark and dismissed it from the case. Under Texas law, a plaintiff without a medically probable cancer…