37 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 10, 2025 · in the opinion
Holste v. 3M Company (2025)
…cv-09814-JLS-E. January 10, 2025. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge. (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 34) Before the Court is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Young v. 3M Company (2016)
…2013 WL 7088637, at [\6] (allowing limited jurisdictional discovery to determine if the plaintiff's allegation that the defendant sold materials to a company doing business in North Carolina was sufficient to establish general jurisdiction). Therefore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)
…basic training, Mr. Dugas was assigned to be an aviation structural mechanic or metal-smith ("AMS"). Id. His job duties were general aircraft maintenance, which included documenting and repairing defects. Id. at 20-21. The Navy…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · November 5, 2007 · in the opinion
LaPOINTE v. 3M Company (2007)
…Heatbath's products contained asbestos. Furthermore, although they agree that in general, a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn of reasonably foreseeable dangers posed by another manufacturer's products, they assert that the duty…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Lund v. 3M Company (2013)
…Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 25, 2008 · in the opinion
Lapointe v. 3M Company (2008)
…1126 (R.I. 2001) (citations omitted); Volino v. General Dynamics, 539 A.2d 531, 532-533 (R.I 1988). It is well-settled that a genuine issue of material fact is one about which reasonable minds…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Oklahoma · June 21, 2019 · in the opinion
In re Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)
…One problem with this argument is that while J & J makes general statements that the indemnification agreements and shared policies are applicable it has not produced any admissible evidence pointing to specific language in the indemnification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Wells v. 3M Co. (2016)
…plaintiff must be considered to have discovered such an injury when he or she is actually diagnosed as suffering from a particular disease, even though unaware of its cause" (Sweeney v General Print., 210 AD2d 865…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Henry Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…4 at 29:25-30:4). Plaintiffs then go on to show that in Henry's general catalog and Henry's commercial products catalog, it states that Henry did produce and manufacture asbestos-containing plastic roof…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyd v. Super. CT. OF Alameda County (2014)
…severity despite intervening pain medications and treatment, and will result in loss of mobility and general disability." His cancer is currently in stage III (out of 4 possible stages). Individuals at stage III can deteriorate very…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Hartfield v. 3M Company (2016)
…however, because she did not allege that the dealership had knowledge of the defect when it sold the car and state law did not impose on the dealership a general post-sale duty to warn. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)
…of action and actual damages). \[4\] To the extent plaintiffs rely on general allegations of asbestos exposure from landfills or in the air within the larger community — in other words, exposure entirely unrelated to his employment…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Webb v. 3M Company (2022)
…Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 13, 2024 · in the opinion
Lowe v. 3M Company (2024)
…but rather, by affidavits or otherwise the opposing party has an affirmative duty to set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact." Henry v. Media General Operations, Inc., 254 A…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Hayden v. 3M Company (2015)
…of its broad language and unique purpose, the federal officer removal statute has been interpreted to operate somewhat differently than the general removal provision. Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Carson v. 3M Company (2018)
…s 1972 Federal Register publication regarding asbestos safety precautions, coupled with the 1979 Reenactment of the General Laws of Rhode Island (1956)—precludes the exclusive application of the WCA to the Decedent. The 1972 OSHA publication…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Leech v. 3M Co. (2017)
…the removal statute's unanimity requirement, all defendants removing under the general removal statute must join in or consent to removal if they have been "properly joined and served."\[79\] Here, the parties do not dispute…