No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014

    Haas v. 3M Company (2014)

    …continued the case after his death. This opinion decided summary judgment motions by Boeing, General Electric and Goodyear. The court held that Boeing was protected by the government contractor defense, because the Air Force collaborated on…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2019

    Nelson v. Holley Performance Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …for a more definite statement as untimely. After Daimler, a corporation is subject to general jurisdiction only where it is incorporated or has its principal place of business, and specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a) requires…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Young v. 3M Company (2016)

    …2013 WL 7088637, at [\6] (allowing limited jurisdictional discovery to determine if the plaintiff's allegation that the defendant sold materials to a company doing business in North Carolina was sufficient to establish general jurisdiction). Therefore…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lund v. 3M Company (2013)

    …Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…