No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 6, 2020

    Rivera v. General Electric Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    The trial court denied General Electric's motion for summary judgment on workers' compensation exclusivity grounds and, alternatively, on punitive damages, so plaintiffs' claims against GE proceed. Workers' compensation exclusivity bars only injuries arising from employment…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017

    McClung v. 3M Company (2017)

    The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014

    Haas v. 3M Company (2014)

    …continued the case after his death. This opinion decided summary judgment motions by Boeing, General Electric and Goodyear. The court held that Boeing was protected by the government contractor defense, because the Air Force collaborated on…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2020

    Rivera v. Meriden Molded Plastic (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Electric Schenectady Works; New York; General Electric, Schenectady, Schenectady apprentice and union electrician (IBEW Local 3) New York 1956-1975; electrician and elevator mechanic General Electric, Schenectady Schenectady…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 1, 2023

    Haeck v. 3M Company (2023)

    …removal. The court agreed. Under Ninth Circuit precedent (Self v. General Motors), a case becomes removable only through a voluntary act by the plaintiff. Because the summary judgment for Allied Fluid was involuntary from Plaintiffs' perspective…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Young v. 3M Company (2016)

    …2013 WL 7088637, at [\6] (allowing limited jurisdictional discovery to determine if the plaintiff's allegation that the defendant sold materials to a company doing business in North Carolina was sufficient to establish general jurisdiction). Therefore…

  7. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Carson v. 3M Company (2018)

    …s 1972 Federal Register publication regarding asbestos safety precautions, coupled with the 1979 Reenactment of the General Laws of Rhode Island (1956)—precludes the exclusive application of the WCA to the Decedent. The 1972 OSHA publication…