No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …LLC. Eaton Corporation, individually, Cross Defendant, represented by Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gould Electronics Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by David Phillip…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Denbow v. CBS Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy, Corporation (2016)

    …U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). (D.I. 1) Defendants CBS Corporation, f/k/a/ Westinghouse Electric Corporation\[1\] ("Westinghouse"), and Crane Co. ("Crane") joined in Foster Wheeler's Notice of Removal. (D.I. 4; D…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 16, 2022 · in the opinion

    Thorne v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2022)

    …Id. at 611. The plaintiff removed the thermal insulation blankets for overhauling the turbine as part of general maintenance. Id. The plaintiff alleged he breathed asbestos dust after the blankets were removed and while cleaning the…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …of 1963. (Id.) D. Plaintiff's product identification evidence Caterpillar Inc. Mr. Charlevoix stated that he performed maintenance work on eight Caterpillar bulldozers during his time at M.J. Electric. (D.I. 155, Ex. 1 at…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    … Ex. B at 243:7-245:12) He admitted that his work on the fire pump was limited to turning its electric motor on and off, and that he was not present when other individuals performed…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021

    Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting General Dynamics' motion for summary judgment against the Carnes plaintiffs because they produced no evidence that Mr. Carnes was exposed to an asbestos-containing product attributable to General Dynamics. Under Texas…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…