No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    The court granted summary judgment to Crown Cork & Seal, CBS, General Electric, Gardner Denver, Link-Belt and Riley Power, and denied it to Crane Co. and John Crane, Inc. on the maritime claims, so the Heddens…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · February 12, 2019

    Brucker v. CBS Corporation (2019)

    Harold Brucker served in the Navy from 1960 to 1967 and was exposed to asbestos aboard the USS Salisbury and the USS John R. Craig. He was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in 2015 and sued several manufacturers of products he said contained…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 14, 2020

    Hailey v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    The estate and family of Charles Anthony Shockley sued several equipment makers after he died of pleural mesothelioma in January 2016. Mr. Shockley served in the Navy from 1968 to 1972 as a machinist mate on the destroyer USS Henderson, working…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Dugger v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)

    …Products of Connecticut Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg, Meringer Zois and Quigg LLC. Genuine Parts Company, Cross Defendant…

  5. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C. (Rebecca K. Wood of counsel), for General Electric, amicus curiae in the first above-entitled action. [\775] Jones Day, Washington, D.C. (Shay Dvoretzky and Emily J. Kennedy of counsel…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. Ronald Dummitt v. AW Chesterton (2012)

    …Boeing Co, 654 F3d 852 (9th Cir 2011), cert den 132 SCt 1582 (2012) and Faddish v. General Electric Co., 2010 WL 4146108 (ED Pa 2010), Crane was entitled to the defense. For the reasons below…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    …the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)

    …successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Tishman Liquidating Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)

    …but then Dr. Moline gave general testimony concerning the pain associated with mesothelioma without distinguishing between the two men. Initially, the issue of consolidation is properly before us and we reject the Konstantin plaintiff's contention…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2016

    Thurmon v. Georgia Pacific, LLC (2016)

    …the injury. Exposure to third-party asbestos gaskets used on the defendant's valves was not enough, and the court did not need to adopt a general 'bare metal defense'. Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …Dkt. \# 146) at 12 ("The medical literature has established malignant mesothelioma. . . as, in general, a dose response disease, that is, each exposure to asbestos-containing dust has been shown to contribute to cause diffuse malignant mesothelioma. …

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 14, 2013 · in the opinion

    Tobin v. Aerco Intl. (2013)

    …a seaman, Mr. Tobin stood watch on the bridge and deck, painted, and performed general repairs. He also visited the ship's engine room below deck where his coworkers performed work on pipes, valves, pumps, turbines…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at p. 566.) This test "is not necessarily foreclosed simply because the product at issue is only in specialized use, so that the general public may not be familiar…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Brewer v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …manual, which he described as a "Navy document that originated with the manufacturer." These general statements do not constitute evidence that Crane specified or required the use of asbestos in its replacement gaskets and packing. The…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · June 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …Dr. Dikman testified that the general population is exposed to asbestos in the ambient air.\[16\] Dr. Dikman clarified that "the measurements in the air samples in the general population, and air samples have been used…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Handley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2009)

    …purpose of judicial construction of a statute is to determine the meaning that comports most closely with the intent of the Legislature "\with the view to promoting rather than defeating the general purpose of the statute…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…