No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

59 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 3 of 3

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988 · in the opinion

    Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …CELOTEX CORPORATION EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION GAF CORPORATION ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. KEENE CORPORATION NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 15, 1993 · in the opinion

    Higginbotham v. Fibreboard Corp. (1993)

    …Ct. 26 (1993) 630 A.2d 14 Nathan HIGGINBOTHAM and Jean Higginbotham, H/W v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, Keene Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., GAF Corporation and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Appeal of FIBREBOARD CORPORATION. Argued March 30…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 1991 · in the opinion

    Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1991)

    …Manhattan, Inc., Celotex Corp., Southern Textile Co., J.P. Stevens Co., Garlock, Inc., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Fibreboard Corp., GAF Corp. Fred and Lorraine LILLEY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., Pacor, Inc., Eagle-Picher Ind., Unarco Industries, Inc.…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 9, 1992 · in the opinion

    Taliferro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1992)

    …Insulation, Inc., GAF Corporation Garlock, Inc., H.K. Porter Co., Inc., Southern Textile Corporation, Keene Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens- Illinois, Inc., Pacor, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Unarco Industries, Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · September 13, 1989 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1989)

    …defendants: Celotex, Eagle Picher Industries, Fibreboard, and Raymark. Defendants Keene Corporation and Owens-Illinois, Inc. were found not liable. The jury awarded damages to plaintiff Menne in the amount of $2,500,000.00. By stipulation…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)

    …Mitchell, Fibreboard Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Continental Casualty Company, Pacific Indemnity, Francis McGovern, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, Columbia Casualty Company, CNA Casualty Company of California, Celotex Corp., Daniel Herman Rudd Jr., on…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  8. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · January 25, 1988 · in the opinion

    Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp. (1988)

    …1, 1983, Daniel Brisboy was named as the successor personal representative of the estate of Charles R. Rand. \[2\] The original complaint also named as defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois Corp., Nicolet, Inc., Johns…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994

    Keystone Steel and Wire Co. v. Costa (1994)

    The appellate court affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning (including the new trial limited to wrongful death damages) and affirmed the denial of Keystone Steel & Wire's petitions for subpoena-compliance expenses, so the plaintiff and…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979

    Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)

    Edwin Nolan worked as an asbestos insulator from 1941 until May 1973, applying asbestos and fiberglass pipe coverings and related materials. He sued several makers and sellers of those products, alleging defective products and failure to warn. His…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …caused from exposure to asbestos. In one action, John Hansen filed suit in California against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (OC) and 199 other named defendants, alleging personal injury from his own exposure to asbestos. In another…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994

    Costa v. Dresser Industries, Inc. (1994)

    …the widow's claims of trial error and her sanctions request. Expert testimony from a witness disclosed months before trial was properly admitted under Illinois Rule 220 even though the plaintiff never served Rule 220 interrogatories…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 1993

    Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp. (1993)

    The court affirmed the liability finding against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and the damages awards to Mr. Krivanek's estate and children, but reversed the denial of a new trial on Mrs. Krivanek's damages and remanded…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982

    Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    Carman Staiano sued a group of asbestos product makers, including Johns-Manville, Owens-Corning and Celotex, for personal injuries. His wife, Rita, sued for loss of consortium. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos dust from…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 19, 1997

    Potter v. Patterson (1997)

    The widow and children of John Potter sued Mine Safety Appliances (MSA) and many other companies and individuals. They alleged he died of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure over many years of work for NOPSI. The plaintiffs settled with MSA alone…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …applying Michigan law, rejected three. Alternative liability failed because not all possible suppliers, including Owens-Corning and Johns-Manville, were sued. Market share liability was unsuitable because asbestos products differ in harmfulness, and nothing showed the…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …defendants' motion for judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] Johns-Manville Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation. Plaintiff did not name Johns-Manville because it had filed for bankruptcy status. \[2\] Contra Abel v…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 24, 1983 · in the opinion

    Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp. (1983)

    …Inc.; Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 26 B.R. 644 (E.D.Wis.1983). The careful balancing of interests mandated by the Supreme Court in Landis requires that the stays granted in the instant cases…

  19. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion

    Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)

    …958-959; 275 SE2d 900 (1981) (cause of action accrues when, according to medical testimony, plaintiff was first harmed by asbestos); Neubauer v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp, 686 F2d 570, 577 (CA 7, 1982), cert den…