No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

135 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 7

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 8, 2021

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    Laura Walls sued several companies, individually and as executor of her husband Robie Walls's estate. She alleged he died of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure during a career from 1960 to 2002 as a tractor-trailer…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 30, 2021

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    …Damages; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Yellow Freight; Adley/Yellow Freight terminal; Archie's Motor Freight; Great Coastal (Richmond); Mack Trucks (Richmond); Mack Trucks, Richmond; Great Coastal, Richmond; Archie's Motor Freight, Richmond; Adley/Yellow Freight…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · July 1, 2013

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    Joseph Anderson Jr. sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants over his mesothelioma. After he died on June 7, 2008, his wife and executor, Arva Anderson, took over as plaintiff. The opinion does not describe where…

  4. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 21, 2017

    Walls v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asebestos Litigation, 2017)

    …affirmed the Superior Court's judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding any error in the partial summary judgment on third-party replacement brake parts was harmless because the jury found Ford not negligent. An error in…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 20, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)

    …court granted Ford's motion to quash the trial subpoena to Matthew Fyie, granted plaintiffs leave to designate Fyie's deposition testimony, and granted Ford's motion to strike plaintiffs' late objections to Ford's counterdesignations…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)

    …court granted Ford Motor Company's motion to dismiss only as to plaintiffs' wrongful death employer liability claim, which was dismissed with prejudice, and otherwise denied it, so plaintiffs' other wrongful death claims against Ford continue…

  7. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · June 17, 2021

    Sheets v. Ford Motor Co. (2021)

    …decision and remanded to the trial court, holding that neither appellate court had jurisdiction over Ford's interlocutory appeal of the denial of summary judgment on up-the-ladder immunity, so Sheets's estate prevailed on…

  8. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · December 2, 2019

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Ford's motion for judgment as a matter of law and its inconsistent-verdict challenge, but reversed on the excessive-damages ruling and remanded so the Superior Court…

  9. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 2007

    Varner v. Ford Motor Co. (2007)

    The court of appeals affirmed summary judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding Yvonne Varner's workers' compensation death claim was filed too late. Under R.C. 4123.85, a workers' compensation death claim from occupational disease…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2016

    Rost v. Ford Motor Co. (2016)

    …affirmed the judgment for the Rost estates against Ford Motor Company, holding that the causation testimony was proper and that, although consolidation with two other cases was error, Ford showed no prejudice. An expert may tell…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 20, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)

    …premises and employer liability claims against Ford, found strict products liability claims already pleaded, and said a continuance would cure prejudice to Ford. A party seeking to amend after the scheduling-order deadline must show good…

  12. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 3, 2011

    Welsh v. Ford Motor Co. (2011)

    …new trial, so the widow Sylvia Welsh won and Ford Motor Company lost. A workers' compensation claimant must show by a preponderance that the disease was contracted through injurious exposure in the course of employment. Coworker…

  13. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The Delaware Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, its alternative motion for a new trial, and its motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    …of Special Appeals reversed the judgment for Mrs. Wood against Ford Motor Company for insufficient proof that her husband was exposed to Ford's brake and clutch products, and affirmed the judgment for the Grewe plaintiffs…

  15. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 3, 2020

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    On remand from the Delaware Supreme Court, the Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the $40.625 million compensatory verdict for Paula Knecht in place. A jury…

  16. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 27, 2018

    Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …verdict against Ford Motor Company, so plaintiff Mary Juni lost and Ford won judgment as a matter of law. Viewing the evidence in plaintiff's favor, it was legally insufficient to establish that Ford's conduct…

  17. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 19, 2013

    Farrall v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …plaintiff's motion for reargument, leaving in place its grant of summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on the failure to warn claim about asbestos-containing replacement parts. Under Delaware law, a manufacturer has no duty…

  18. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 12, 2018

    Call v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    The court granted Ford Motor Company's motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Marilyn Kay Call, holding Indiana's "but for" causation standard applies and her expert's opinion did not meet it. Indiana's general…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …a new trial on apportionment of fault among Ford, other automakers and brake pad makers/suppliers and on the amount of punitive damages. Where the jury found Ford's brake pads defective and a substantial factor…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015

    Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    The court granted Ford Motor Company's post-trial motion, set aside the jury verdict for plaintiffs Arthur and Mary Juni in its entirety, and directed judgment for Ford. Under the Court of Appeals' decisions in…