16 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 27, 2012
Pease v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The district court adopted the Special Master's report, rejected Crane Company's objections, and denied Crane's second motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs' claims against Crane continued. A transferee MDL court's earlier…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 21, 2017
Walls v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asebestos Litigation, 2017)
…affirmed the Superior Court's judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding any error in the partial summary judgment on third-party replacement brake parts was harmless because the jury found Ford not negligent. An error in…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · December 2, 2019
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Ford's motion for judgment as a matter of law and its inconsistent-verdict challenge, but reversed on the excessive-damages ruling and remanded so the Superior Court…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The Delaware Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, its alternative motion for a new trial, and its motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 3, 2020
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
On remand from the Delaware Supreme Court, the Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the $40.625 million compensatory verdict for Paula Knecht in place. A jury…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 19, 2013
Farrall v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2013)
…plaintiff's motion for reargument, leaving in place its grant of summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on the failure to warn claim about asbestos-containing replacement parts. Under Delaware law, a manufacturer has no duty…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 12, 2018
Call v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
The court granted Ford Motor Company's motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Marilyn Kay Call, holding Indiana's "but for" causation standard applies and her expert's opinion did not meet it. Indiana's general…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion on the negligence, failure-to-warn and punitive damages claims, because Johansen's brake exposure was de minimis and Ford owed no duty to…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
…Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Copes-Vulcan, Ford and Goodyear and the denial of the Richards' request to supplement their expert report or for reargument. Under Ohio law, Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.96…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009
Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
Charlevoix performed clutch and gasket work on Ford vehicles owned by family and friends. (D.I. 216, Ex. 3 at 152:16-19) However, Mr. Milligan could not recall the manufacturer of any clutches or gaskets…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 8, 2018
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Fairbanks, Ford and Goodyear. A party seeking to supplement an expert report after summary judgment must show good cause or excusable neglect, and plaintiffs who never sought leave before judgment was entered did not do so…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 25, 2023
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…one of first impression under Ohio law, not Delaware law. Ford would remain in the case regardless, and Hennessy gave no evidence that the issue would affect other cases. The court found no benefit that outweighed…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 24, 2020
Shaw v. American Friction (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
Shad Shaw was diagnosed with mesothelioma in April 2016. He and his wife Sarah sued seventeen companies in Delaware in March 2017, alleging asbestos exposure in his jobs and as a shade tree mechanic, all in…