18 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 18, 2019
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…products made or sold by several companies. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2015 and later died of it. General Electric, Foster Wheeler and Westinghouse (CBS) moved for summary judgment, arguing there was no evidence of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
The court granted summary judgment to General Electric, Crane, Foster Wheeler, Warren Pumps, IMO Industries, Buffalo Pumps, Armstrong International and CBS, and denied the plaintiffs relief on their strict liability and negligence claims. Under maritime law…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017
Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)
…judgment to General Electric, Crane, Air & Liquid Systems (Buffalo), Aurora Pump, Atwood & Morrill, CBS, IMO Industries and Warren Pumps. Under the court's narrowed bare metal defense, a component maker can be liable under general maritime…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Malone v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Nash Engineering Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Eric Scott Thompson, Franklin & Prokopik. Velan Valve Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Donald Robert Kinsley, Maron…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)
…Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Gould Pumps, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, FPL, and Bechtel.\[1\] The complaint gives a short description of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · October 22, 2009 · in the opinion
Stephens v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Corp.; General Electric Co.; General Motors Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Grinnell Corp.; Hardie-Tynes Manufacturing Co.; Honeywell International; Imo…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)
…Doc. 344-8: Carpenter Dep. at 84\]. Each unit at the plant contained one coal-fired Combustion Engineering boiler and one General Electric steam turbine. \[Doc. 344-1: Duke Power Service Manual at 7-8\]. Foster…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · March 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Gehant v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2022)
…at 19.) Plaintiff argues for a more expansive definition of "required" than the three situations described in DeVries. Relying on a District of Massachusetts case, Sebright v. General Electric Co., 525 F. Supp. 3d 217 (D…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)
…successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)
…supra, 43 Cal.4th 56, a manufacturer is exempt from its general duty to warn users of its product's dangerous propensities if the plaintiff, by virtue of his or her specialized training or profession, knows…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · October 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…detailed in his report that General Specifications for Machinery "required manufacturers to provide installation, operation and maintenance instructions as well as \safety precautions' as an essential part of Instruction Books for machinery and electrical equipment." (Doc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · September 1, 2023
Cook v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2023)
…maritime law applies, with state law only supplementing where maritime law is silent. General maritime law does not bar loss of consortium, punitive or survival damages against a manufacturer in such a case. Product Identification; The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Court must consider whether Oneal's claims are governed by federal admiralty law or by state law. In general, admiralty law applies to a tort action when the alleged tort occurred on navigable waters and the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…be contrary to the command for uniformity between rules governing the same injury, whether under the Jones Act or under the general maritime law. See id. There being no evidence that punitive damages were traditionally awarded…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…claims specifically—the claims at issue here. (Dkt. No. 139 at 13.) Thus, Plaintiffs fail to establish that the relief sought has been historically available under general maritime law. See Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…infrequent." Even when taken together with the plaintiffs' evidence of Mr. Logan's general job duties and the large number of Powell valves on site, this is insufficient to draw an inference of exposure from Powell…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…by Mr. Tallman. (D.I. 97 at 5-7) Plaintiff's references to general block exposure do not assist the court in determining to which specific components Mr. Tallman was exposed. (See D.I. 91 at…