8 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · October 22, 2009 · in the opinion
Stephens v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Products, LLC, f/k/a Barton Instrument Systems, LLC; John Crane, Inc.; Leslie Controls, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Marley Co., Division of Weil McLain United Dominion; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Packing & Insulations Corp.; Peerless Industries, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…the Fourth Circuit's frequency, regularity and proximity test. It found the evidence speculative and weaker than in Jones v. Owens-Corning. It declined to adopt a relaxed test for mesothelioma and granted Powell summary judgment.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)
…has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Malone v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…s exhaust piping. The asbestos-containing insulation materials he used were supplied by his employer, Badham, not Cummins, and Badham obtained its asbestos insulation materials from Owens-Corning, Kaylo, Shook & Fletcher, or John's-Manville. (D…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)
…thermobestos," Owens-Corning's "KAYLO" and Kaiser's "Vee-block." Beginning in 1964, Johns-Manville began placing a warning label on the side of cartons containing its "thermobestos" pipe covering.\[3\] Beginning in 1966, Owens-Corning…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)
…possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.