20 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
…Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2007
Cepeda v. AC&S, Inc. (2007)
The trial court denied Ford's and General Motors' motion to exclude the CCAR S/P2 training materials, granted their motion to exclude other CCAR web site material and the videotape, and granted plaintiff Cepeda's…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007
Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)
…Ford, General Motors and Honeywell lost their challenge to the Chapins' expert evidence (one judge dissented). A trial court acting as gatekeeper under MRE 702 and MCL 600.2955(1) need not resolve genuine scientific disputes…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2006
Berger v. Amchem Prods. (2006)
The court denied DaimlerChrysler's motions (joined by Ford and General Motors) to preclude evidence that brake and clutch dust causes asbestos disease, to dismiss the complaints, and for a Frye hearing, so the plaintiffs (Berger…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009
Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Teruel-Armstrong v. Borg-Warner Morsetec, Inc. (2010)
…51 Cal.App.4th 1447; Mileikowsky v. Tenet Healthsystem (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 262; Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1202; see also New Albertsons, supra, 168 Cal.App.4th at…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010
Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)
The Superior Court reversed the trial court's summary judgment for Allied Signal and Ford (and the other friction product defendants) and remanded, holding that the trial court wrongly granted the defendants' Frye motion excluding the…
-
Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002
Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)
The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008
Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)
The court denied Viacom's summary judgment motion because genuine factual disputes remained on causation, and granted Ford's and GM's unopposed motions, so Mrs. Kummer's claims against Viacom go forward. Under general maritime…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)
James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 13, 2003
Polito v. Burns Int'l Services Corp. (Matter of Asbestos Litig., 2003)
…repaired over a number of years. The remaining defendants were Burns International (formerly Borg-Warner), DaimlerChrysler, Ford and General Motors, all involved in making or distributing brake products. Before trial, they moved to exclude certain evidence…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (2009)
…II. ANALYSIS A. Standard of Review As this is a diversity action, Kentucky substantive law applies. Gahafer v. Ford Motor Co., 328 F.3d 859, 861 (6th Cir. 2003). Procedurally, federal standards for summary judgment govern…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion
Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
…309 Wis. 2d 541, 556, 749 N.W.2d 581, 589 (negligence); Austin v. Ford Motor Co., 86 Wis. 2d 628, 643, 273 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1979) (strict liability). The comparison to be made…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion
Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)
…59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 10, 2007 · in the opinion
Caradonna v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2007)
…New York, New York, Attention Timothy J. McHugh, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant General Motors Corporation. Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., Newark, New Jersey, Attention Bhavna Changrani, Attorneys for Defendant LIRR and MTA. FREEDMAN, J. In…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Duro Dyne Corp.; Essex Specialty Products, LLC; ExxonMobil Oil Corp.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion
Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Inc.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to the former Vellumoid Division of Federal-Mogul; Ford Motor Co.; Foseco, Inc.; Foster…