4 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…rationale for why it should can be gleamed from the California law cited by the plaintiff. California follows the general rule of no duty to warn, but recognizes exceptions to that doctrine.\[13\] In Sherman v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 12, 2021 · in the opinion
Faivor v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2021)
…(2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular injuries plaintiff suffered (general causation) and (3) that the plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause such injuries (specific causation)" (Sean R…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · May 19, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…l\]ike a number of other jurisdictions, Ohio follows the general rule that a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn of adjacent parts supplied by a third party, the so-called bare metal defense…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2020 · in the opinion
Petit v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…testimony of Craig Mountz, AMMCO's corporate representative. The New York Times article highlights the use of asbestos in the industry in general, but does not aid Plaintiff in satisfying the Sweredoski standard. The Mountz testimony…