No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls (2022)

    …24, 2014). In Vedros, the plaintiff filed suit against multiple defendants in state court, and three defendants, General Electric, Foster-Wheeler, and Westinghouse, subsequently removed the case pursuant to the federal officer removal statute. Id. at…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ragusa v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Association (2021)

    …Ann Puente-Martin, Roth Martin Hainkel, Frilot L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Foster Wheeler LLC, General Electric Company, CBS Corporation, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Fmc Corp. Kaye N. Courington, Blaine Augusta Moore, Brittney Bullock Ankersen…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 4, 2017 · in the opinion

    Templet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2017)

    … refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[111\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be "strictly construed in favor of remand," the federal officer removal statute's language must be liberally interpreted.\[112…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Landry v. Columbia Casualty Company (2014)

    …a voluntary act of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs correctly argue that the general rule is that "other paper" does not render a case removable unless it is generated by the voluntary act of a plaintiff. Plaintiffs' argument fails…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…